Around 58 MPH
2006-08-09 10:28:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by legalbambino 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm about 3 hours from Chicago and we also are lower than a wind advisory till 7pm. The speeds indexed decrease than are 25-35 mph gusting as a lot as 40 5-50 mph. So it is also very windy the following! lol
2016-11-23 18:10:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by knake 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
let the speed of wind in chicago be 'x' miles per hour
now
mountain's speed is 298% faster than that in chicago so
the speed of mountain is x + x*2.98=3.98x
that is 3.98 times the speed of wind of chicago
but the speed of mountain is given which is 231 miles/ hour
3.98x=231
x = 231/3.98 = 58.0402 miles per hour in chicago..
2006-08-13 05:57:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by the oracle 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
wind speed at Mt. Washington = 398% * wind speed at Chicago
Solve on your own. 398% because it says "its 298% faster than" which means it is 298% in addition to the 100%
now you should be able to solve this.
Hope this helps.
2006-08-09 10:32:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let MW be the Mt.washington wind speed, and CHW the chicago wind speed, then what you know is that
231 mi/h = CHW + (298/100)*CHW
231 mi/h = 3.98*CHW
( 231 mi/h ) / 3.98 = CHW
=> CHW = 58 mi/h
I hope this helps.
2006-08-15 13:53:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Christian 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
298% x C = 231
C = 231/2.98
etc
2006-08-09 10:27:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Barkley Hound 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
(100 x 231)/398 = 23100/398, so about 58 mph
2006-08-16 11:54:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by HARTaGOLD 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please do your own HW...
its easy:
298/100 = 231/x ....
solve for x...
x = 23100/298 ... and if you can't solve that, well I have lost hope.
2006-08-09 10:22:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by AresIV 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ratio is 398:100 then
it is (231/100)x231=58.3 miles/hour (app)
2006-08-13 06:17:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Amar Soni 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If something is 100% faster, then it is twice as fast...
If something is 200% faster, then it is tree times as fast...
Then you can calculate it yourself...
2006-08-09 10:22:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Thomas NP 2
·
0⤊
0⤋