Can you imagine it? Canada would even have a chance of kicking our a**ses if the day ever came liberals ran our country.These people don't fight terror, they belive in it!
2006-08-09 09:22:46 · 18 answers · asked by Simms 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I will vote you for president. You would probably be a better president than Bush.
2006-08-09 09:26:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wait a minute, you won't be able to ***** with one breath that Liberals run each and all of the media and that's why the "good information" from Iraq will not be able to get by using, then say that because of the fact one station is going bankrupt, all liberals will not be able to even run the country.I recommend if the Libs run the cases, CBS,NBC, ABC properly, they are actually not bankrupt, so does it save on with that the Libs CAN run the country? Can they do any worse than whats been in there for the previous six years? I recommend what with commerce deficits and the nationwide debt ceiling having to be raised various cases interior the previous few years( an option no longer granted to Air u . s . of america) it would not look Reps are in any place to sing hallelujah themselves. And thats no longer even touching wellness care.
2016-11-04 05:36:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How does one become a "chicken gay Liberal?" And the way you put your asterisks in asses, would mean that it was spelled with a third s...assses. Learn how to spell and use proper grammar ("...if the day ever came liberals ran..."). And by the way, Liberals voted to go to war with the Taliban. So who doesn't fight terror? Your question is invalid. Good day to you my friend.
2006-08-09 09:34:59 · answer #3 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the day you go to war and live though it then you can talk...its really easy when your sitting on the side lines. and as far a Canada goes all they have to do is stop selling oil and gas to the US. Canadians liking terror well they lost ten good soldiers in the last two days fighting over there
2006-08-09 09:34:45 · answer #4 · answered by dave m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The same way a bunch of nutless, draft-dodging, smegma covered neo-con Conservative Repubicans could. Except we wouldn't have an invented "war on terror".
2006-08-09 09:28:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, stop the silliness and the name-calling. There are plenty of reasons to oppose the liberals without sinking into the gutter with them.
2006-08-09 09:38:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When you say "chicken," are you referring to the countless members of the Bush administration and Republicans in Congress who never served in the military and/or chose not to go to Vietnam?
2006-08-09 09:28:26 · answer #7 · answered by jmdonovan2002 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And we have a Republican pig running the country that did not go to Viet Nam because daddy got him a desk job!!! I am a vet and I am not a Dem !!!! So I would say Bush is one chicken AHOLE !!!!!
2006-08-09 12:59:32 · answer #8 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're a freaking Christian moron. You're right bombing people always solves problems. And those that get bombed never turn into terrorists. Go back to school you little whore.
Viva la Revolución!
2006-08-09 09:27:38 · answer #9 · answered by someDumbAmerican 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not all liberals are "gay", and not all Gays are passive in fact in my thirty years of working with them in the restaurant industry I have found just the opposite.
As in life, one falsehood in your question makes your whole point moot.
The question makes you seem uneducated.
2006-08-09 09:29:43 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would never vote for a chicken they can't even talk or feed themselves btw never met a chicken that was liberal or conservative
2006-08-09 09:27:44 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋