One newspaper said that, "Heather Mills thinks she is the Queen of Hearts, but all she will ever be is the Queen of Tarts."
Heather is not going to win sympathy with her staged claims of being locked out of the house, and seemingly having a direct line to the Daily Mirror! Given her history she should have shown some dignity for once in her sad life and taken the generous settlement offered by Macca - in that way over time people would have forgotten all her rewriting of history. But she has no self respect - and will make her poor daughter a laughing stock at her antics.
2006-08-09 09:15:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
My temporary Pot Noodle picture is a homage to a fellow YA contributor!
2006-08-09 09:24:47 · update #1
I don't think she has a leg to stand on. Before their problems Paul gave her a plane! Christ they aint cheap! He gave her a bottle of Immac for the other leg. Love the noodles. Ain't been away, pregant wife, business to run and a saab convertible to buy! How posh am I!
2006-08-09 09:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I take it you dont like her very much?
I guess the fact that the holy Sir Macca organised his lawyers to issue a legal letter after her nanny took a couple of bottles of cleaning fluid from a house is not narrow minded, petty and daft?
Maybe he thinks he is Prince Charles?!
Do you honestly think she could have hired ACME Solicitors from down the High Street when he hired who he hired? Do me a favour!
He married her and refused a pre-nup which means he was quite happy to give her standard treatment (25%) which I am not saying is fair, but essentially its what he had agreed by not getting a pre-nup organised. He is a silly old fool and he is smarting that everyone else knew it and he didn't. He should look on the bright side - he will still have £600m to himself.
2006-08-10 00:46:08 · answer #2 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought the talk of a settlement was just a rumour and that amounts had never been discussed. Or so said the Daily Mail. I think Paul McCartney behaved like a silly boy, marrying a women so much younger than he is. Why don't rich men marry women the same age as they are? Or why do they think young women marry them - for love? And why is it more ok to condemn Heath McCartney for being a golddigger than her husband for being a fool?
2006-08-09 10:10:44 · answer #3 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally I think she is a courageous woman, look what she has achieved as a unidextor. I have no idea about and have no interest in the break up of her marriage. She has probably been manipulated by the press to fit the role of money grabber. It's people like you who read tabloid junk and frankly have an illogical and inappropriate hatred of someone you have never met that causes such drivel to be written in the first place.
Does she think she is like princess Di? How pathetic.
Wake up!!
2006-08-09 09:40:55 · answer #4 · answered by Chriatian IV 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's hired the best because she wants to squeeze as much money as she can out of Macca.He has offered her £30 million for a quickie divorce,not bad for a whore,but she wants more.She saw Macca coming a mile away,a lonely elderly man,then dropped her fiance like a hot brick.I think 30 pence would be too much.
2006-08-09 09:27:30 · answer #5 · answered by michael k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she should have taken the settlement, it is more than generous after only 4 years of marriage.
she will start complaining in a while that the press will not leave her alone and that she is hounded constantly and she is stressed and heading for a breakdown because of it all.
she will blame paul and his army of fans for making her life unbearable and yet she has done this to herself.
she should be grateful for whatever she gets and go and live life quietly and well away from everybody else.
2006-08-09 09:24:28 · answer #6 · answered by cross_sox 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a sucker, she conned him.
Hiring the same Lawyers that handled the Royal's divorce means that she may well get more than the initial settlement offered.
But I agree with the common assessment of her.
A common if highly priced hooker.
Alas her daughter will be judged by the actions of the Mother.
2006-08-09 14:08:35 · answer #7 · answered by Stuart G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree with you... she is the queen of tarts for sure.. not sure what paul ever saw in that B... to marry her, I hope she gets nothing but a "FINGER" from Paul and let her go back to hooking like she did before he found her !
2006-08-09 09:21:01 · answer #8 · answered by Kathy B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is just a greedy woman looking to get all she can. I cant believe that Paul didn't have a prenup that was silly on his part. Looks like now he is going to pay for it.
2006-08-09 09:22:00 · answer #9 · answered by sunniej1977 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you think Paul is looking for someone else yet? I'd sign a prenup for £30 mil.
2006-08-09 09:19:57 · answer #10 · answered by poppy vox 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋