Im thinking Bush first, then Republican Party in general.
2006-08-09 07:58:41 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Whomever is in power.......and will help murdoch's plan....
its not about party loyalty....its about money and power.
2006-08-09 08:02:13 · answer #1 · answered by friskygimp 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fox Network news, definitely.
When you get a chance, check out the film OutFOXed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism. It's really compelling - absolutely blew my mind.
Roger Ailes, the president and CEO of FOX News, was pretty much the Karl Rove of the Bush Sr. Administration (he played a key role in the infamous "Willie Horton Ad" that was put out in the '88 election)
2006-08-09 08:13:03 · answer #2 · answered by Pask 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, so Fox news is one sided. I thought they were "fair and balanced" or are they fair and balanced of the Republican view?
I think it should be the job of all major US media to support America and the constitution, not a political agenda.
2006-08-09 08:05:55 · answer #3 · answered by Waas up 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox "News" is for Republicans, by Republicans, about Republican view points. They should take some of that "personal responsibility" Republicans are always crowing about and remove the "fair and balanced" label once and for all.
2006-08-09 08:06:42 · answer #4 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it isn't the government's job to create greater government jobs. the government is tasked with starting to be an ecosystem that facilitates the non-public sector to create jobs. they could't try this with outrageous regulations and taxation. Now, if each and each of the president and different liberals in Congress can concentration on are the "evil" companies, how does that create a climate that encourages the advent of jobs?
2016-12-11 10:35:45 · answer #5 · answered by foote 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL, Idiots. I suppose CNN, CSPAN, CBS, ABC and NBC are fair and balanced, and in no way likely to slant the news to favor the liberals, who all of those "news" agencies staunchly support.
Perhaps by "fair and balanced" they simply mean they are balancing out the liberal media that can't manage to report the actual news, but their opinions of the real news, after conveniently pruning out any facts that would make them look like the blundering morons that they are. Which would then make things a bit more fair.
Have any of you genius liberals seen the pic of the women in Lebanon returning to a destroyed home? Well, there's supposedly been many of these "pictures", unfortunately for the liberal media, it's now been found out that it's actually 1 picture that they keep doctoring to make the news what they wish it really were.
At least Murdoch made his money legally, the Kennedy family can't make such claims.
2006-08-09 08:23:32 · answer #6 · answered by baldninja2004 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it's not Fox job to do that but they do a good job DON'T THEY. You lost the election two more years two more years eat your heart out. Oh by the way I assume you TV has more than one channel so you can change it when you get tiered of hearing the truth from Fox.
2006-08-09 08:03:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The correct name for it is Faux News, the semi-official annex of the present White House "catapult the propagandy" office.
2006-08-09 08:07:31 · answer #8 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, but media has been supportive of dominant political figures for awhile now. they use to be unbiased & just report the news, somewhere along the way they felt it was more american to support or favor a leading candidate.. i think theyre bought out like most actors & top artists...
2006-08-09 08:07:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox News is owned by Rupert Murdoch, a staunch conservative.
2006-08-09 08:02:58 · answer #10 · answered by Daphne 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So that leaves the rest of the media outlets to hate Bush?
2006-08-09 16:56:51 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋