He didn't find him in Iraq. So I would suppose so.
2006-08-09 07:37:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The bin weighted down family contributors and the Bush family contributors have been in company at the same time for a protracted time. From reminiscence, the bin Ladens and the timber the two had substantial possession interior the Washington submit (i think of). There are different company and social connections, going lower back some years. possibly the family contributors grow to be flown out for his or her own protection. there are maximum of connections between those 2 families that the conspiracy theorists have a field day with them.
2016-12-11 05:50:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I fail to see the logic in your assumption. Finding Bin Laden
would be a political coup for Bush and would justify, in the eyes of many, the current administration's war on terrorism.
2006-08-09 07:48:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Spade, Sam Spade 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush was never looking for Bin Ladin. Since they were old friends and have photos of their mutual admiration, I doubt if Bin Ladin was anything but a ruse to get into Afghanistan for the Uzbekistan pipeline, and Iraq for the oil fields.
2006-08-09 07:41:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by yes_its_me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Finding Ben Laden is not the answer. Who cares. Personally I would like to send him to Allah. It might be to late for the answer. The answer was back in the the 1940s when our gov. backed the Jews to kick the Palestinian people out of theire home land. Wouldn't you fight. The answer is the Palestinian People. A group of foreigners landed on ther soil and kicked them out. Why do the jews need there own home land? I'm a Lutheran but I don't need to kick the Catholic next door out of his house to practice my religion. There were German jews French jews Polish jews. Jews from every where. Why do they think they need there own country. Since I'm a Lutheran should I move to Germany, which is mostly Lutheran? Don't be ridicules.
2006-08-09 07:59:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by c321arty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
in the next coming election day, Bin Laden is going to be kill by bomb and the head will be blown off butthe body will be seen and broadcast by CNN first , i gues arrangement is already done and seal, remeber how bush come to power second time
2006-08-09 07:41:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by aliajao 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton surrendered to Bin Laden.
But Bush will never give up. He has hundreds and hundreds of people hunting Laden while you whine.
2006-08-09 07:39:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure we're stilling looking for him. AND YOU KNOW IT'S NOT EASY. But if you have a way of finding him instead of bitching about Bush America would like to hear it I'm sure.
Or maybe you want to join the military and help find him?
No, I figured you didn't.
2006-08-09 07:50:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love the answer that Clinton let him get away well 911 happened on Bush`s watch and if Clinton let him get away why did we not here that when Bush was running for president, and why did Bush not hold at least one anti-terrorist meeting when he was appointed.
2006-08-09 07:49:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe if Clinton would have done something with Bin Laden when he had him THREE times we wouldn't have to worry about him. But you libs will just say he has rights and want to put him on trial when we do catch him. Hypocrites.
2006-08-09 07:39:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He knows exactly where he is. Osama is an agent for our government and will be assinated by the CIA when his usefullness runs out. Probably near the next Presidential election.
2006-08-09 07:45:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by diaryofamadblackman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋