goes out of their way protecting other's people children but doesn't protect their own and would rather see them split up?
Bush wants to secure Iraq's borders and drop ours. Was he really our best choice for pointman with the war against terrorism?
2006-08-09 07:21:02 · 9 answers · asked by yars232c 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Of course he is the best choice. The last guy sure as hell wasn't going to do damn thing. I don't understand your question. You are talking about parents then you go off about terrorism. How is your family being split? You make no sense.
2006-08-09 07:31:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A good parent is one who "is a parent", one who "parents", not one who wants to be a friend to the child. One who sets boundaries, restrictions, and punishments for violations.
Iraq rejects parenting, friendship, common sense: it accepts death, destruction, and stupidity. That doesn't apply to all Iraqis, just the Islamo-facists and other factions that murder each other....
Pointman? who would you want? Kerry? Gore? With them, America would be experiencing terrorists acts, instead of fighting the Islamo-Nazi-communists in their own lands, we would be letting them butcher us here.... no thanks.... I don't approve of the way Bush operates in Iraq, not enough troops: at the start and now, but I do approve of the war being fought there instead of here.
When someone starts a war, you(if you have any common sense) take that war to them as much as possible.
2006-08-09 07:33:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no war on terrorism!
The borders have been an issue forever, even when we illegally settled Mexico, tried to Annex it, and had to fight a war to take it from them. Those in Texas are immigrants and should hold Mexican Passports.
Corporations are trying to be the politics of the future! They think the world belongs to them, and if you aren't careful, it will!!
Bush is part of the corporate push to wrest your land from you! That's how stupid he is.
2006-08-09 07:28:15 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! he was the best choice.What do you mean by drop our borders?If Bush were to seal our border tonight and station every available soldier there,all of the pro- illegals would cry a flucking river.
2006-08-09 07:50:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep he was elected twice...but then Ted Kennedy was also after killing a girl...your point doesn't say much for the American Public...ooopppsss...
No he wasn't the best choice..our choices needed to be expanded before it even does any good to make one..
2006-08-09 07:51:20 · answer #5 · answered by Mistchf 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What, are you new? Of course he wasn't the best choice.
2006-08-09 07:25:16 · answer #6 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was elected (even if it was a questionable election) so, the people have spoken. Twice.
2006-08-09 07:32:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would you make something up just to get your name on Yahoo. He does not want to "drop " our boarders. Please think before you type.
2006-08-09 07:25:54 · answer #8 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, he wasn't the best choice
at least he can't be reelected
2006-08-09 07:25:40 · answer #9 · answered by Dwight D J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋