English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-09 07:02:51 · 6 answers · asked by Capt.Corelli 1 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

Ive only got one leg, and sure would rather have both hands. Even both legs gone would be easier in my opinion.

2006-08-09 07:07:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definitely legs. I had a wrist injury at work four years ago and tell you from experience, losing hands is a very big deal. I could never bend enough to brush my hair or teeth, bathe, etc. It would be tough losing your mobility but touch,...

2006-08-09 07:12:44 · answer #2 · answered by Bob D 6 · 0 0

I don't know it's so hard, at first I wanted to say legs but know that I've thought it over, I know it would be harder without hands.

2006-08-10 04:35:12 · answer #3 · answered by fabee 6 · 0 0

I could still drive my Mustang with nubs for hands, but the legs/feet are nice when areas I might travel to may not be "Wheel-chair accessible".

2006-08-09 07:08:04 · answer #4 · answered by jokerscard692000 4 · 0 0

legs... that one is pretty easy. Could still use computer, write, feed myself etc when hands. Can even walk on if u good enough.

2006-08-09 07:07:50 · answer #5 · answered by WhiteHat 6 · 0 0

i really dont know

2006-08-13 04:25:54 · answer #6 · answered by purple diamond 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers