It's not really a question but a fact. If he had courage he would have gone to serve in Vietnam; he would have sent his daughters to Iraq; he would have mandated a draft; he would have raised taxes. A courageous man would inspire his nation instead of dividing it; he would lead by example. George is a coward. Hey Republicans, if you support him, aren't you also cowards?
2006-08-09 06:23:28 · 23 answers · asked by slyintellectual 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, but that's the least of my problems with him.
To me, the cowardice is his absolute terror over being in the vicinity of anyone who disagrees with him. THAT's cowardice.
No, it isn't fair to call his supporters cowards. They're wrong; many are heartless brutes, many are ignorant, but they aren't necessarily cowards.
2006-08-09 06:35:09 · answer #1 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah a real coward who learned how to fly jets in defense of our nation....exactly what have you done for the defense of our nation?
Your "statement" not a question deserves the same in response. Did you send your children to Iraq? Why raise taxes don't you waste enough government money already?
And just who has divided the nation - people like Joe Lieberman and GW or maybe a little "move on" dot com?
2006-08-09 13:27:48 · answer #2 · answered by netjr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't slyintellectual pathetic?
It's not really a question but a fact. All he can do is whine and complain about the president all day long! Is it because he has no life? Hey Democrats, if you support slyintellectual, aren't you also pathetic?
If you were really so brave you would go over and fight in Iraq or call Bush a coward in front of his face. I don't think you have the balls to do either! So you really shouldn't be talking.
2006-08-09 13:32:28 · answer #3 · answered by Luekas 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What a stupid question. He is serving as commander in chief during what could be one the most important times in history and did serve honorably in the guard despite the phony CBS information you want to believe so badly. Nobody should "send" their kids into the military if they don't want to go and we don't need a draft, the all volunteer military is doing fine. This isn't Vietnam, or the Vietnam era and the last thing we need is morons that can't read serving in this high tech military we have now. And why should the government confiscate more money? What is so great about that? If you really want the government to have extra money laying around why don't you libs send more of yours instead of "cowardly" having the government confiscate it for you. And also, newsflash, this country isn't great because of any president, their daughters or sons, or any political leader, we don't have a king or queen here, this country is great because everyday people join the military because they want to and serve because they want to and don't wait to see what any precious political icon does. The government, the president, the congress, they don't make this country great, people you have never heard of and never will hear of make this country great by doing what they need to do
2006-08-09 13:40:55 · answer #4 · answered by tiredofworking1 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why would the President send his daughters to Iraq or mandate a draft? Neither is necessary at this time. We have a volunteer military force that has been doing very well. I presume that YOU won't be volunteering anytime soon.
2006-08-09 13:38:04 · answer #5 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No more than Billy Clinton was a coward. They all are. They are prepared to send men to their death for their own political purposes but not prepared to take, or let any of their family members take, the risk of being put in harms way.
2006-08-09 13:32:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about him being a coward but he has screwed up this Country and he will go down as one of (If not) the worst President in History!
2006-08-09 15:21:48 · answer #7 · answered by MSJP 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Granted, he could have fought in Viet nam, but instead he served in the National Guard so he would not have to. Why would he send his daughters to Iraq. Isn't that there decision?
2006-08-09 13:36:42 · answer #8 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think GW has succeeded in anything he ever attempted. He did duck out of service after his dad got him into the nat'l guard...which meant someone else had to go to Vietnam in his place...he is completely out of touch...and the 20-30% of those who support him don't seem to see the threat he is to our country...for instance if a real crisis were to emerge...our military is tied up in Iraq...what are we going to do? Right - we're screwed....
2006-08-09 13:30:37 · answer #9 · answered by Mac 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since he probably won't get thrown out of office or tried for war crimes, our only payback will be that by the time he's out of office he won't have a single accomplishment to point to for the eight years of our time he wasted, and that in a very short amount of time he will be labeled as the worst president in recent history!
2006-08-09 13:30:15 · answer #10 · answered by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋