Who believes that Diana Princess of wales was murdered?

Answer 1

What we believe is irrelevant. Facts are important. A law passed in 1603 stipulated that the Scottish and British monarchy should merge. That meant that the "mongrel seed" of illicit affairs of all royals had to be relegated to positions of dukes and duchesses and three strains of Royalty should produce legimate and married "Royal Pedigree." Among the chosen would be from the House of Tudor, Stuarts, Saxe- Coburg- Gotha and the Hanoverians --lineage from the Burgundian Kings. When World War 11brought friction to the Western powers--that meant scrutiny would be applied to the "heirs of the Arian" aristocracy, so, the German branches blended into the House of Windsor. There was an unresolved love affair between ancestors of Camilla and Charles that was purged by the "Purists." When the gentry found out that Charles and camilla first re-ignited ancestral flames, they tried to disrupt the union between Camilla and Charles as they had done before, none more painful than the way they hauled the Earl of Clarence away from his duties in Antigua in the West Indies and made him King William IV in June 26th 1830. What the history books never disclosed is that he had 11 illigimate children with a Mrs Jordan, one, not of royal pedigree. They managed to persuade him with the same argument they presented to Charles--that they needed to preserve the purity of the monarchy along certain bloodlines. Princess Diana was selected for such a task. After she produced two Royal heirs, Charles allegedly felt that he had done his royal duty. I will write no more on this matter save to say that Charles and Diana's decision to go their separate ways, might have upset more than a few people. All I will do is remind you that the limousine was bullet-proof and it had only four vulnerable points-the same four points that were penetrated. After all, Camelot is perfect.
Boaz.

Answer 2

The assumption throughout the assassination theories is that the british royal family has any control over an agency capable of performing such an assassination. They don't. The last time they did and used them to such an extent was back in the days of Walsingham and Elizabeth I. The modern day security services are not allowed to operate, let alone operate abroad, without the knowledge of the government. The government would never let such an operation proceed.

Also, there is always this story about Diana being pregnant with Dodi's child, who would then have a right to the throne. Allow me to clear that up right now - under the primogeniture aspects of royal succession, The right of succession passes through the heirs of the first born son of the monarch. So, Princes William and Harry. Any potential offspring would not have been Prince Charles' son, and thus excluded from the line of succession or placed at the end of it. Bearing in mind that succession has currently got about 1000 people in line for it, that child, even if born, would never be monarch, and given that the moniker HRH is entirely within HM the Queen's gift, and the child was illegitimate and heir of a member of the royal family who had herself given up the title HRH, that child would never be a member of the royal family in any right.

To summarise that in brief - Charles carries the succession in his own right, as first born son. William carries the succession in his own right as the first born son. Diana, as not a direct descendant of the Queen (unless you're alleging incest), did not carry the succession of her own right. Neither would any of her sons outside her marriage to Charles.

Bearing in mind that the driver of the car was drunk, and that the Bodyguard survived as he along was wearing his seatbelt, it all points towards an accident.

People throughout history have always come up with out of the ordinary suggestions for when something entirely ordinary happens. Marylin Monroe was a notorious drug addict,

A car crashed - people died. That is the fact. Another fact is, based on the principle of the line of succession, no child of Diana would ever stand a cats chance in hell of becoming monarch - ergo there was no need for her to be 'murdered'

Occams razor points towards an accident.

But thats not what you want to hear.

Answer 3

Probably not, on the balance of the "facts" we are told However there is something very fishy regarding this terrible incident. Why are we still waiting for the outcome of an enquiry after so many years
Incidentally, I was in Times Square, NY, when the news flashed up overhead. Everyone of all races, colours, religions etc seemed genuinely very, very shocked and sorry.

Answer 4

I think that if she was alive at the accident paramedics could have done a better job. They could have got her out and into hospital quicker. The first hour is so important yet the French didn't seem to care. I have no doubt it was not a straight forward accident and that she was murdered but it will never be proved.

Answer 5

I think she was murdered as was Marylin Monroe. But unfortunately the people who know the truth have been silenced or gotten rid of. So it maybe that we never learn the truth, but time alone will tell.

Yes I do ladymoonlight, but by the same token I think they're entitled to know the truth as they will never move on and Princess Di will never rest in peace. God-Bless her soul.

Answer 6

No sane person who's not a paranoid conspiracy freak.

Leave the poor woman in peace. She wasn't "murderered". Have you any idea how horrible this must be for her two sons to keep reading this crap!

Answer 7

many thinking folk believe this, the trouble is our grandchildren will be taught in school there was a disobediant princess that left her husband and 2 sons and ran off with one of those terrorist muslims so she was put to death by they police.

Answer 8

I do not. It would be one thing if she was shot, but her driver was drunk, driving like a maniac and wrecked. It is that simple. I think there might have been a lot of people relieved she died but it was not murder

Answer 9

i do. heres why. the cameras in the tunnel failed for the first time in 15 years. the nearest hospital was twenty minutes away (they took her to one an hour away.) all commercial radio stations failed for one minute before and after the accident. this apparently is how the sas, exicute their missions.

Answer 10

i certainly do there is no way the royal family could accept a british princess with an arab baby