Who's better ? Hitler Or Bush ?

Question

Not a joke, so serious answer please , No other answer wouldn't taken for the best

Answer 1

Hitler is dead, that makes him better than Bush.

bush family are war mongers and have been since the 1800s

Answer 2

I think that Bush is better than Hitler. Hitler killed people Bush isn't killing anybody. If you are talking about the war, the people serving chose to stand up for thier country and people need to respect their decisions about it. Bush is doing a great job and if he was able to run again I would vote for him again.

Answer 3

It depends what you mean by "better". Hitler was much more adept at manipulating people so that he could implement his insane, fascist delusional fantasy. Bush, fortunately, is inept. So although he has wasted hundreds of billions of dollars, eroded civil liberties, violated the Geneva convention, given torture the green light, alienated our allies, been the worst diplomat in the history of the U.S. presidency, tried to get his totally unqualified 2-bit lawyer friend on the Supreme Court, totally abandoned his pledge to be the "education president", doctored intelligence, exposed an undercover CIA agent, totally inflamed the middle east, driven gas prices through the roof, repeated the mistakes of Vietnam, stolen two elections, and taken Joe Liebermann as his mistress - despite all of that he hasn't been able to get the American people onboard with his fascist agenda. In fact, polls show that by the end of his second term, if he isn't impeached by then, his approval ratings may be in the single digits.

So, I guess he's an impotent fascist.

Answer 4

From the theoretical point of view, the comparison between Bush and Hitler is correct. The scientists have described Nazism as a terrorist dictatorship of corporate expansionism. Bush, by putting himself beyond the law and invading a defenceless nation which it had not attacked in order to take over its oil wealth, the second largest on the planet, and then stating that other oil-producing nations will follow, comes close to the definition of a corporate terrorist dictatorship. Even though he may not like to admit it.A Nazi great-grandfather, a Nazi grandfather, a father who wasn't able to be a Nazi because Hitler had already killed himself in the ruins of the Chancellery gardens, though he benefited from the ill-gotten gains of his ancestors.Like Hitler, Bush does not believe in the Rule of Law. This is not a State which possesses Laws, but a State which yields, of its own accord, to the rule of law and in no circumstances can it break the law, even less for reasons of State. Abominable crimes have been committed in the name of reasons of State, or the Homeland, or national security.For Bush, the oil is on a plate. All he has to do is take it. It's just that he just doesn't know how easily he could choke on it.

Bush's second game plan is to discipline his ally Saudi Arabia, the world's number one oil producer and largest energy reserve, whose pricing policy is of little value to US interests. The third aim, as revealed by the undersecretary of state, John Bolton, last February, is to invade Iran and Syria, which together with North Korea form the "Axis of Evil". And, if winds are favourable, why not include Libya in the Holy of Holies? The fourth step is to destroy OPEC and control the world's fossil fuels. If it doesn't expropriate these and find alternatives in time, North-American capitalism will be forced to change its model of national consumption, and with it perhaps lose the fulcrum of its global hegemony. The fifth aim is the succulent bandwagon business of reconstructing Iraq, onto which are leaping many of the 500, mainly US, multinationals dominating the world. No less important is the sixth objective, which lives off the teachings of Lord Keynes; using the war industry to pull the US economy out of the deep zero-growth recession which it is in. Let's not forget that winning a war is not about imposing one's military supremacy over an adversary, but being able to reap the financial returns thereof, the reason why it was unleashed in the first place

Answer 5

President George Bush is a hell of a lot better than Hitler.

Answer 6

Not a good question
I loathe Bush but he is a lot better than Hitler.

Answer 7

You mean who's the lesser of the two evils -"devils"?

I think Hitler is history and what he's done is almost forgotten -well until we are reminded ;)

Bush is alive and we are living what he's doing. So for me, Bush is worse!

Answer 8

Hmmm, let me think, ummmmmmmm. Hitler. no wait, I mean Bush. Wait, if this was a serious question you would not be comparing the two because they are un-comparable to anyone who knows anything.

Answer 9

I got to go with Bush on a basis of a lower casuality count. For now, at least.

Answer 10

hitler by far he rallied a country that was close to nothing after world war 1 and turned germany into a super power the worlds most powerful country before world war 2 than he lost it in his head