no, they have right just like other country in the world, although is not bd if the nuke can be allow to be monitor
2006-08-09 06:05:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by aliajao 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is a leader who is trying to better his country (both inside and in world standing) and doing a far better job for his country than Bush has done for America. I fully disagree with Ahmadinejad's tactics in raising Iran's posture in the world, but he is pulling it off, while Bush has dragged America down into the mud and created a literal world full of hate for America.
But truthfully, he seems to fit the description of the antichrist pretty closely. I would say Bush does, but he obviously isn't a good speaker and pushes more people away from him than brings them closer. On the other hand, Ahmadinejad seems to be bringing the rest of the world closer to his side in his thinking, he is a great speaker and seems like a great guy to me, but he seems to be working for peace and war at the same time. Listen to him right and he makes it sound like America is war hungry (and right now the leadership is, though America overall isn't) but that if America "corrects" (quotations to emphasize these are his words, not mine) itself he'll work for peace with them. The only thing is that Ahmadenijad seems unwilling to work with Israel, but if that changes I might think he is the one that was prophesied in the bible to bring about Armageddon.
2006-08-09 12:36:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He didn't do any terror act so he is NOT -yet in American standards!
Iranians are people just like Americans so it would be stupid to call peoples terrorist just because of a geographical location. Whats more stupid is call governments terrorists because they don't say "YES SIR" to ours!
2006-08-09 12:43:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mas S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know he is an Idiot. But let us define a terrorist. Is everybody now a terrorist according to bush admin? fidel castro is a terrorist too, right? Hey about that Sharon guy, who is dying now, was he not a terrorist?
2006-08-09 12:35:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Captain W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is not stable enough to be a terrorist. He is even more dangerous.
He makes other previous tyrants look like playground children.
2006-08-09 12:45:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by scubadiver50704 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no he is a president like yours the problem is that he is against Israel and US so you call him a terrorist there is no nuclear weapon in Iran .....but US government is in love with war be serious and don't be a slave to the American media and Bush words
2006-08-09 12:33:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
coz western media told u so. what do u expect of what Iranian thought of GW Bush? a hero?
2006-08-09 12:36:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by art 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a word yes. And he looks like Gilligan
2006-08-09 12:26:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
terrorist has many definitions these days. all these definitions are stated as per the USA governments liking. in actual it does not have its own meaning.
2006-08-09 12:50:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he was involved in the '79 kidnappings, then yes, he is. Otherwise, he's just a madman.
2006-08-09 15:27:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by KDdid 5
·
0⤊
0⤋