would the world be a better place if bush was not president and blair was not prime minister?

Answer 1

I would guess yes.. For obvious reasons..

Answer 2

There have been many, many years when Bush was not president and Blair was not Prime Minister. Did you notice the difference? No, I thought not.

Answer 3

THEY have been improbable soul-mates, the silver-tongued British barrister and the drawling Republican from Texas. But the partnership between Tony Blair and George Bush has shaped world events in the nearly five years since the attacks of September 11th. Over the past year, however, the debacle in Iraq and problems at home have turned both leaders from soaring hawks into the lamest of ducksSo let's deal in truth. Let's talk about crime. Specifically, the flagrant war crime committed by Bush and his comrade in moral cretinhood, Tony Blair, in May 2002, as TomPaine.com reports. Yes, 2002 – long before the ground invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The "Downing Street Memos" – top-level UK government documents whose authenticity has been confirmed by Blair's own office – show clearly that Bush and Blair began a ferocious air war against Iraq in May 2002, despite the unequivocal ruling by Blair's own lawyers that such a campaign constituted a clear act of military aggression: the "supreme international crime" for which the Nazi leaders were condemned at Nuremberg.But the memos reveal that Bush and Blair had already decided on war, during their April 2002 meeting at Bush's ranch in Crawford. No doubt the two Christian leaders – who bray their faith in Jesus at every opportunity – knelt in prayer together as they sealed their pact of blood. From that point on, the memos show, Blair and Bush ignored all concerns about legality, all questions about the shaky WMD evidence, and the extensive worries of many insiders about the near-total lack of planning for the post-war situation. They sought only to "create the political conditions" for war, manufacturing public consent through slick, fearmongering propaganda and, in the memos' most famous phrase, by "fixing the facts and intelligence around the policy" of aggression.

Answer 4

jdnfv speaks a lot of sense. Bush has shown he has little intelligence and Blair has shown he will do anything to be popular in the USA. Bush and Blair are responsible for so many deaths and destruction of property throughout the world. They should both face trial for war crimes.

Answer 5

It wouldn't make a bleeding difference geezer...
If Bush and Blair were ousted by their public - which I believe did happen in America but was ignored by the supreme court - then the same industrialists that tell them what to do would tell their successors what to do as well (and there would be no choice) because [those successors] would agree to it before being handed the vote by those paymasters.
---
Think! Accept pessimism, and lose te faith!

Answer 6

Absolutely not, if Bush wasn't President I can guarantee that the United States would have been attacked several more times, as bad or worse that Sept. 11, And most likely if a PM of Britain hadn't stepped up and back the US they would have been targeted by those terrorist bastards....

Answer 7

Yes if Bush wasn't president world would be better.
No for Blair. The UK doesn't matter as it's not a superpower.

Answer 8

The Mullahs in Iran think so. So do Osama Bin Laden and Kim Jong Il. I'm sure that Saddam Hussein wishes that were so. Probably Udai and Qusay would as well if they were alive.

And let us not forget the staff of the New York Times.

And John Kerry.

Howard Dean.

Nancy Pelosi.................

Answer 9

No it wouldn't be better because then Kerry would have been president. Bush is a help for the country. I don't know why everyone blames Bush for everything bad.

Answer 10

NO because if BUsh didn't start it then the other guy would have...maybe in a different way but the outcome would be the same......the pres is not the only who makes the decisions.... there are many parts the the executive brach of our government.

Answer 11

bush did not win the election al gore did there was about 600 votes difference(dont qoute me, whether gore would have been different who knows however its the freemasons that decide what happens there is a plan, it will be successful as they have the power they have done Afghanistan, Iraq looks like Lebanon will be done soon then Iran and Syria after them who knows there is no democracy in the west as al gore would be in the wh, as for bliar he is a lap dog, a toy pet.,