English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It scares me what might have happened if John Kerry were in office on 9/11---we would not be as safe as we are now

2006-08-09 04:34:30 · 50 answers · asked by Penguin Gal 6 in Politics & Government Government

50 answers

We are no safer now than we were before 9/11/01. George has done nothing to keep you safer.

2006-08-09 04:37:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Not everyone hates President Bush, there are a bunch of lame brains that believe things that the liberal media spouts and the trash Michael Moore put out. Anyone that has seen that needs to watch "FarenHype 9 11" (I rented it from Netflix)This movie features the same people that were in Moore's Folly, they are outraged at the way things they said were twisted ot suit Moore.

I think the reason you see so much of it here is because this is the only place the Kerryites can spout off and not have to listen. If you want to read something interesting go to this question http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ah8IJUqD8LUxDSksI_cKAUnsy6IX?qid=20060725072218AAW2Ko4 read the answer that chippychip gave.

2006-08-09 05:07:09 · answer #2 · answered by ronrlogan 5 · 2 1

Maybe if you would look at the facts about Bush you would be Anti-Bush also!! Kerry has nothing to do with the damage Bush has done to this country! What good has Bush done, that question was posted on here and all you pro Bush people could not say anything!!! And I am not a Dem !!! Facts speak for themselfs, take a look at them !!! And safe don't even go there, We are not safe at all and if you would look up facts on that you would know that too!!! Before you ask a question like this ask your self why you don't look at the TRUTH??????

2006-08-09 04:50:37 · answer #3 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 1 2

I certainly am not against George Bush. Quite the contrary. He and his administration have done an incredible job in light of great difficult situation in the war on terrorism, and other natural disasters, as well as bringing the economy out of recession, which started during Clinton's Administration into a robust, growing economy. President Bush's achilles heels is the fact that he is not a BS'er and a smooth talker like President Clinton is. Heck, Clinton could sell ice to the eskimos, while President Bush has trouble selling baguettes to the French. But don't get me started on Les Français.....

2006-08-09 04:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by EDDie 5 · 3 1

Because most of the Anti Bush folks using it are either H.S. kiddies or the typically misinformed liberal college youth. With that being said I believe the Bush Administration as made some major screw ups, however having been around since the time of JFK I'll still vote for a conservative over a Liberal Democrat.

"If you're not liberal when your in your 20's you have no heart, if you're not conservative by the time you're in your 40's you have no brain. Sir Winston Churchill"

2006-08-09 04:42:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

George is doing the best he can- some knuckleheads just think that a democrat any democrat could do better! John Kerry/Al Gore would have run off to Canada somewhere -they are wussies , and Bush is not!

2006-08-09 04:42:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I hear what you are saying, but people are fed up with the war, and many now beleive Bush deliberately mislead people into thinking Iraq was a threat, where actually Iraq was no threat to the US at all. He does not present himself as a bright man in most situations. Nice guy to go have a drink with, but leader of the US? And why were the Saudis his best freinds? And the Bin Laden family allowed to leave the US right after 9/11 although every other plane was grounded for 2 days? He has lost people's trust.

2006-08-09 04:42:07 · answer #7 · answered by cbmaclean 4 · 1 3

It is wonderful to be living in a free society where you can freely voice your opinion in a place such as this. Many young men and women are dying for that freedom. Not agreeing with why- I will refrain from complaining -- dead is dead and i am grateful to these young men and women. I owe them more than I can repay. I will say this... I will surely be at the poles when the next vote comes about. If for no other reason--just to voice my opinion. I also hope our soldiers don"t read this forum..while they are fighting for the very freedom you are enjoying right now.

2006-08-09 04:45:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Because about 70% of Americans disapprove of his performance, and that is reflected on this site. John Kerry would not have been in office on 9/11. It would have (and should have) been Al Gore.

2006-08-09 04:39:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Everyone on here is anti-Bush because they're intelligent! Al Gore should have been in office on 9/11 since he won the 2000 election - Kerry didn't run until 2004. If Gore had been in office, we wouldn't be in Iraq.....the troops would have gone to Afghanistan and bin Laden would have been captured by now. But, thanks to Jeb Bob in Florida, he was able to steal the election for his idiot brother - and look at the mess we're in now!

2006-08-09 05:54:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

DEMOCRATS ARE THE REASON.....

because most people have the mindset of being a socialist and communist. They dont believe in freedom but more control, they have been trained to think that way through polluted media, and polluted education. Therefore democrats exist....this party offers people like Kerry, Clintons to run the country, this is the best they can offer which is pathetic, they have destroyed our nation and have sold our secret security system to china, murdered people out of their way just to keep the white water scandal at low, and had oral sex in the white house.....what more do you want...this is the country we live in...NO ONE LIKES MORALS ANYMORE...

2006-08-09 05:08:56 · answer #11 · answered by Princess_777 2 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers