Bush is always beating around it, whose i;m not quite sure.
Blair's name is not correct, it should be Tony Be Liar. I hope he's happy with that.
But let us not poke fun at two unfortunates, every thing they do is news.
Bush is as dense as a forest. While grinning Tony is to receive an award for bravery, have you seen his wife?
Young Leo Blaire was not fathered by the prime minister, he is a grudge baby, someone had it in for him.
2006-08-09 04:41:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I find it interesting that while Clinton was in office and Blair was "overly accommodating" to him, you lefties never complained once. Now that Blair is equally "overly accommodating" to Bush, you accuse him of being gay (which I thought was a good thing in the left's eyes), and a lapdog. Blair seems to be the one that has remained constant while you've changed. He seems to like Americans and both of out recent presidents. Call him naive or stupid if you want. Frankly, I'm impressed that he seems to be fairly independent minded, resolute, and willing to stand up to adversity when the easy course for him would be to fold to his party and the populace in England and abandon his support of the US.
2006-08-09 04:34:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Crusader1189 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
blairs not gay...just british...
As for the actuallity of the question, bush is just a prick with a chip on his shoulder, playing big man to impress daddy...
With a little luck the us will open their eyes and not only remove him from office but remove him from the country...i say send him over there and leave him...
as for blair, hes just a *****...too afraid that if he doesnt defend bush then the us and uk will have a "fall out" and cant be frineds anymore...
Talk about playground bullshit.
2006-08-09 04:15:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by foxy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush this and Blair that? This is none of our business although it looks that way.
Our business is to rein the idiots in. This involves getting some kind of leash on those dogs of war wearing suits and smiles, whose mouthpieces are Blair and Bush.
2006-08-09 04:20:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by mutaali t 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush and Blair are a pair of fannies.
Anyone who voted them back in at the last elections should hang their heads in shame.
2006-08-09 04:16:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by badgerbeetle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they don't. If you cannot treat political debate seriously, please don't participate. Aside from that you appear to have a basic ignorance of human anatomy. In order to support your witty (irony) assertion that Blair must be gay because he's 'bending over backways' to please Bush, surely he'd need to bend over forwards to get the effect your oh-so-humorous analogy requires. Idiot.
2006-08-09 04:15:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by eriverpipe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Certainly Bush is not blessed with brains, don't know about his ears, Blair is just plain stupid, the kind of "monkey say, monkey do" leader who is no good to man nor beast.
2006-08-09 06:01:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Drfoot 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
how do you know it is Blair that bends over, perhaps it is Bush that likes that position, or at least he does when he is with Dick Cheney.
2006-08-09 04:12:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pres. Chimp 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush and Blair, nice couple...
2006-08-09 04:27:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
who plunged the world into certain major conflict?....wanna recount those senate votes....how about actually telling the truth....now that would be a first wouldn't it.
2006-08-09 04:14:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by susie_q 2
·
0⤊
0⤋