English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She said she didn't marry him 4 money, yet she wont accept the
30 million agreed, and wants 200 milllion instead!!
I think she's a money grabbing skank.
What do you all think??

2006-08-09 04:00:00 · 36 answers · asked by ali1ukbradford 2 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

36 answers

i couldn't agree with you more. this sleeze of a woman went into the marriage with absolutely nothing but the clothes on her back and a bad attitude. now 'lady' mccartney thinks she deserves more than 30million. its an utter disgrace. what person in the world thinks that £30 million isn't enough to live on? only a money grabbing whore who, lets face it, has made her name through sleezy, debotched behavior. hope she gets exactly what she deserves.........ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-08-13 04:33:17 · answer #1 · answered by mirren 3 · 0 0

She is, if she can't haggle decently, and settle for just 50 million from his first settlement offer. 200 million is obscene.

I'd be happy with the 30 mill (boy, would I??!! I'd even manage to keep it amicable too) and a little nest egg for the baby.

Paul is a decent man offering her so much in the first place. Its like she's won the lottery, rollover and all.

Yes, she's a money grubbing skank! No wonder Paul is being bitter towards her. Especially with revelations surfacing now.

2006-08-12 10:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lets face it she hasnt got the looks brain personality or the body to make money off her own back, if she had a shred of dignity she would of gladly taken the offer of 30 million. I mean lets be sensible here since when does it cost 30 million to bring up a child the government seem to think we can cope quite well on £112 a week so what makes miss mills so different!

2006-08-09 05:37:50 · answer #3 · answered by princess tinkle UK 4 · 0 0

I agree. The 30 milliion is more than she walked into the marriage with. He earned that money years before she came into the picture, she shouldn't be entitled to it. She's being greedy. If anyone deserves that money it would have been Linda, and it should be his kids he leaves it to. She should be ashamed. How can she say she's all about the less fortunate when she's hitting him up for 200 million?!?

2006-08-09 04:05:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Let me see now...

Paul McCartney works for 45 years in the music business and amasses a fortune.

Heather Mills works for 20 years in dubious "modelling" based jobs and marries a multi millionaire pop legend stays with him for 4 years and then claims half of what it took him 45 years to get....

Complete gold digger but under UK divorce laws she will probably get it!!

2006-08-09 04:07:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course she's a skank. Most of Paul's wealth was acquired prior to the marriage. In a fair and just world she wouldn't have a leg to stand on
Paul would have saved a lot of money if he called up Prince Charles and asked him if he knew of anybody that arranges discreet but fatal car crashes.

2006-08-09 04:44:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think anyone would become accustomed to a certain kind of lifestyle after awhile.But I don't think Heather Mills is a gold digger.In several interviews Paul defends her and claims she wanted to sign a pre-nump,but it was he who went against the idea.

2006-08-09 04:07:28 · answer #7 · answered by Celebrity girl 7 · 0 0

they'd a prenup. So she is entitled to SH*T. What she receives could be out of the goodness of Pauls heart if she even receives a dime. women folk that marry for money in straightforward words should be stabbed contained in the interest with a pencil.

2016-11-23 17:39:50 · answer #8 · answered by merralee 4 · 0 0

Yeah i think it's disgusting the way she's treated him, and then expects to get even a penny for it, let alone 200 million. Seems as if she's been counting down the days since getting married to him until she's able to get her hands on his cash.

2006-08-09 04:04:56 · answer #9 · answered by . 7 · 0 0

yes she is, never supported him through his career which is now at an end so what did she do to deserve that amount of money. Any more should be put in trust fund for her child and she should get expenses to care of her own child until they are 21 years old. Kid is real victim in this sorry episode.

2006-08-10 10:13:44 · answer #10 · answered by Breeze 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers