2006-08-09 03:43:32 · 15 answers · asked by poppy vox 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I couldn't care less.
(Well, I could, but then I wouldn't have answered your question)
2006-08-09 09:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by bernieszu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She should CRAWL away. Paul McCartney is very much loved here in England and around the world. Even well before all that came out in the open, a TV documentary over a year ago disclosed the fact that H. Mills had always been after rich men's money. Paul's daughter could never stand Heather. She hated her in fact. So I hope the court here is not stupid enough to award her many millions. All that money belongs to Paul who earned it deservedly and to his children.
Somebody mentioned a pre-nup. I am a law graduate and here in England pre-nups are NOT enforceable. They do not override the courts' power to award what they consider a fair settlement. So I don't think that a pre-nup would do him any good. If I was the Judge, I would award her half a million pounds and nothing else. I would also call to the stand Paul's daughter to tell us what the marriage life was like. In all this I just feel very sorry for Paul... He lost the love os his life, Linda. Linda was just as rich as he was so she was not after Paul for his money !! Such unhappiness. I hope he finds someone nice soon. Ever heard of the expression "MONEY ISN'T EVERYTHING ??" -- kinda true !
2006-08-09 10:54:16 · answer #2 · answered by RED-CHROME 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She shoud hobble away. She was a gold digger from the start. Now she is saying that she will take 40 million & walk (hobble) away quitely. What a twit.
2006-08-09 11:05:13 · answer #3 · answered by majesticwife 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's a gold-digging tramp and he should chop off her other leg. But at the same time, Paul is a complete IDIOT for not getting a prenup. Serves him right.
2006-08-09 10:51:26 · answer #4 · answered by gozedown 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooh that's cruel. I think we should leave the poor one legged tart alone and let her get on with selling her soul to the tabloids so they stop dredging up her past as a two legged whore!!!
2006-08-09 10:48:17 · answer #5 · answered by Spook 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she must be mad, who in their right mind would turn down
£30 million. let her hop away. Paul made his money before she arrived so let him keep the rest .
2006-08-09 11:05:57 · answer #6 · answered by selina24 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It ended as she was unhappy with his last Christmas present he bought her. It was a new wooden leg.
This was even after he told her that it wasn't the main present but a 'stocking filler'!
2006-08-09 10:51:00 · answer #7 · answered by hari fudr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hop as far as her leg hops her!
2006-08-09 11:21:50 · answer #8 · answered by ribena 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she really dont need this kind of nastyness always refering to her only having one leg,he should agree you pay for the child and she should tell him to stick his money she w ould be better off without him and she can always earn a good living tell him to get stuffed, his not all he seems you know.
2006-08-09 11:30:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea, what the hell was Paul thinking not having this leech sign any pre- nupt?
2006-08-09 10:54:58 · answer #10 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋