English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If 60% of the human males born this year will suffer from some type of male infertility & 40% of the males born are going to be homosexual...(These are medical facts)
Is it not then a clearly scientific reality that the male / female that is homosexual is actually an evolved species of human biology? The earth has produced many natural occuring illnesses, Yes? So along this thought process, one would think it is to cull the herd naturally as we over populate the earth and rapidly devour our resources.
Continuing this hypothesis then perhaps is it realistic to also say then that If man, on the other hand, has created vaccines and medicines to alter this nature born process to cull & keep us from over population and destruction, would not nature also asist the human to evolve into an animal that could not alter its natural enviorment? So my question would be: Homosexuals with extra X or Y chromosones IS scientific mutation on a more frequent occurance and what are realistic ?'s

2006-08-09 02:49:24 · 14 answers · asked by Elsibeth 1 in Science & Mathematics Biology

14 answers

Well, I think that you should categorize humans as Women and Men.

Men, as you might already know, are actually an error of nature. The natural human shape is female. So men are actually a little bit of a mistake, and probably the way nature interpreted reproduction. We need to reproduce, so it created a set of incongruent beings for that purpose alone. This is why men die younger. And infertility is directly associated to that.

So men will perish in the future, evolutionarily speaking.

And women will be able to reproduce WITHOUT men.

2006-08-09 02:56:11 · answer #1 · answered by Mario E 5 · 1 0

LOL, Your question might have been relevant had you used actual facts and not some numbers you've either made up or found on some whackjobs website.

40% of men are not born homosexual, not even close to that number. Add to that the fact that homosexuality is really only an issue in highly technologically developed countries, whose societies have too much time on their hands and have become morally corrupt in nearly every facet of their lives, and you then realize that it's not evolution, or even an act of nature for that matter, but instead is something created by our own minds.

I'm not against homosexuality or homosexuals, they can do what they want. I just don't buy into the liberal theory that it's a genetical thing, when it only occurs in certain countries. A societies preferences often have influenced how people in those societies act, it's happened throughout history and will continue to do so.

2006-08-09 10:01:25 · answer #2 · answered by baldninja2004 2 · 0 0

Quoting: {...would not nature also asist the human to evolve into an animal that could not alter its natural enviorment?}

If the activities of humans lead to their destruction, other less environmentally destructive species will flourish instead, assuming that human activity doesn't alter the environmental landscape too severely (think Venus from global warming).

The medical ethics of "culling" is very tricky and should be strictly regulated.

2006-08-09 10:12:28 · answer #3 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 0 0

"If 60% of the human males born this year will suffer from some type of male infertility & 40% of the males born are going to be homosexual...(These are medical facts)"

Give me a source for your 'facts' and then I will consider the rest of your explanation. It seems unlikely that doctors could know for certain how many homosexuals will be born, even though scientists don't even know any genes specifically tied to sexual preference.

The rest of the idea makes sense (homosexuality and infertility is introduced naturally to quell the overpopulation of humans) but you have to get past that one highly questionable statistic to believe this is actually happening.

2006-08-09 09:57:57 · answer #4 · answered by Steve S 4 · 0 0

Great question: your facts are very wrong when talking about the entire population of the earth (but they are true-ish for western city domographics).so the premise is kind of on shaky ground before you start...

Evolution through nature is purely the ability for a DNA gene to replicate and protect itself towards perfection. This is done billions of time within the lifetime of a gene and is one of natures most brilliant inventions.

Is nature helping us to evolve to be gay to protect itself? Sorry but no: evolution is an internal phenomenon: it is from inside our molecules we evolve.

True we react to and with the environment but considering how long it takes to evolve given the fact that we have only really been destroying the planet since 1830 (the birth of the industrial evolution) it is absolutely and truly impossible that evolution is playing a part in mankind suddenly turning to homosexuality...

But I know why we are....you are going to love the answer to that one...

2006-08-09 10:04:22 · answer #5 · answered by Ichi 7 · 0 0

There is no way to state with certainty that 40% of the male population will be born homosexual. This number seems outrageously high. Also what kind of infertility are we speaking of? I would like to know where you get your facts from.

2006-08-09 09:56:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"If 60% of the human males born this year will suffer from some type of male infertility & 40% of the males born are going to be homosexual...(These are medical facts)"

NOT!

2006-08-09 10:01:38 · answer #7 · answered by Know-it-all 4 · 0 0

I stopped reading your question when you said that 40% of males will be born homosexual was medical fact --- everything about the science of homosexuality is still theory now

2006-08-09 09:53:55 · answer #8 · answered by Adam P 4 · 0 0

There are various phenotypes changing in our species.
Let me state that we wont evolve into another subclass we will always be humans.
we are in a long road and our enviorment will determine our next step.
for example look at vestigial organs like the appendix and the coccyx, for example.
we will keep evolving but like i said our enviorment will determine it.
which worries me because s you can see wars industry and pollution are not a good enviorment.
let me remind you that if this happens it would happen in millions of years from know.

2006-08-09 11:20:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Homosexuality is the result of Human influence on themselves.

If you need evidence, go look at other organisms: you don't see any Homosexuals there do you?

2006-08-09 09:55:19 · answer #10 · answered by Tiffany kate 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers