Come on. Are you guys really that dumb. We are fighting for America future here. If many of you should remember, America was attacked twice by terrorist. Once in 91 and again in 01. If we pull out of Iraq, that will show terrorist that we are weak and can not finish the job we started. If you have common sense, then you would know that terrorist will start growing bolder and attacking us more. There would be another 9/11 except on a much bigger scale. Then what will you democrats say? That Bush should have never invaded the middle east in the first place? This futuristic attack would have never happened if we were not in the Middle East?
Let me tell you something about terrorist. They don't give a **** about human life. They hide and kill innocent civilians. They pratice inhuman pratices. But, Democrats for some reason think you can talk to people like that. Or sure they might say they will stop the terror but, they are just waiting to stab you in the back.
2006-08-09 02:23:27 · 9 answers · asked by TJ 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That is why the country voted Bush into office.We need someone who actually cares about the future of America and will get up and do something about it. Not like kerry on hillary, who believe in a diplomatic solution. Look at the Israel Lebanon conflict. If you read your history book, Hezbollah has been going at Israel for many years.And what is currently happening now in the Middle East? Hezbollah has gain more power than before and is attacking Israel again.
2006-08-09 02:26:23 · update #1
And that is why believe it or not, another republican will be elected in office. B/c we need a strong president to stand up to terrorism across the globe. Not a president who will just sit on their *** and hope the problem goes away.
2006-08-09 02:27:44 · update #2
What do you mean Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism?? Damn you are stupid. SADDAM HUSSEIN. KEY WORD!!!
2006-08-09 02:32:15 · update #3
Its sad. But I guarantee another republican will take office. America is tired of Liberal ways. And then if we do take office again, liberal will once again cry out there radical believes.
2006-08-09 02:36:34 · update #4
You Liberals are stupid.
2006-08-09 02:37:07 · update #5
YOU PRETTY MUCH ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION, THEY ARE DEMOCRATES, THEY ARE MORONS.
2006-08-09 02:39:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
George bush has said that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. The fact that you don't get this three years later is proof that you don't know what the hell you are talking about. The hijackers came from Egypt and Saudi Arabia, not Iraq, dumbass.
You are so afraid of terrorists that your fear emboldens them. They see people like you quaking in their boots and they think that we are some sort of joke.
The reason we were attacked on 9/11 was TO PROVOKE A RESPONSE THAT WOULD CAUSE MODERATE ARABS TO JOIN BIN LADEN'S SIDE. Bush fell for the trap and invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, and since then bin Laden in his wildest dreams couldn't have predicted how many moderate arabs would start hating the US and worshipping him.
People like you played into his hands because you are so crazed with cowardice.
2006-08-09 09:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does 9/11 have to do with Iraq? What does bin Laden have to do with Iraq? How come bin Laden's still on the loose when he attacked us?
How is Iraqi "freedom", a representation of "freedom" for the USA?
Connect these two together, then we MIGHT buy it, but so far it looks like typical Con brainwashing and typical Sheep lack of critical thinking.
2006-08-09 09:29:36 · answer #3 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush won because he pulled enough moderate votes in. Moderates who were mad at Clinton for his "Liberal" and embarassing sexcapades in office.
The war in Iraq is Bush's war, planned well before he took the oath of office. Iraq had NOTHING to do with terriorism.
PS the first attack on the WTC was in 93, (Feb 26 around noon, I was shopping with my now ex wife not far away)
2006-08-09 09:32:19 · answer #4 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism.
Iraq had everything to do with oil. Read what Bush and Cheney had to say just before they attacked -- how Iraqi oil would pay for the war, the reconstruction, etc. And how American companies would get to privatize everything and make big profits.
2006-08-09 09:29:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here's why: in 1999 a group of neo-cons drafted a white paper that stated that...........you're not going to pay attention to any contrary answer. Your mind is made up. Why bother to ask the question? Don't let verified(but not well-known - yet) facts get in the way. I will save you a seat at Bush's trial.
2006-08-09 09:34:10 · answer #6 · answered by torchedbyangels 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it's unlikely any other Republican President would have chosen to do it either. Bush's father was targeted by SH after all. Anyway, what's done is done now, I hope we can clean this all up together!
2006-08-10 04:25:33 · answer #7 · answered by Composer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Ive earned it
2006-08-09 09:35:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Andy is a retard.
2006-08-09 09:49:52 · answer #9 · answered by W E J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋