The occurrance of complex life forms via random mutation and natural selection is dictated by the laws of physics, which are laws of a-priori logic.
2006-08-09 02:24:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Consider the life sustaining process of blood clotting. Please, do the research and you will also be amazed at the complexity of this 16 step process. 16 enzymes are needed to in total to trigger the end result that keeps an organism from bleeding to death. All 16 are needed in sequence (one initiates the next). Blood clotting would seem to me as a 'vital' survival mechanism to develop at a very early stage of an evolving organism. The problem is that single cell or even multi-cell 'early' species or as some would call 'ancestors' did not have the capacity for this process. Without blood clotting how could the organism suvive until all of the required 16 enzymes were in place? That's just blood clotting. Look at the eye ball. For the truthful seeker, the evidence is abundant. The question is what is the motivation behind the search. To prove or disprove a previously adopted mindset?
2006-08-09 03:50:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called EVOLUTION.
All the time, in all species, in all forms of life there are differences appearing. Some of these differences are superior and those with the superior mutations, those which are better adapted to their environment, survive and proliferate while the others die out. It's taken us millions of years to get to the life form we are today and every year science is finding more and more supportive evidence. It's natural selection and it's so SIMPLE and OBVIOUS!
But the creationists are so desperate to find a way to validate their fairy stories. Tales written long long ago with no limit of artistic licence. Why couldn't the "intelligent designer" merely start the ball rolling with the Big Bang umpteen billion years ago? You guys are really going to get so disappointed and frustrated trying to make science fit in with your fairy tales.
Wake up and smell the coffee!
2006-08-09 02:06:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by cosmick 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everything is relative, complexities are a matter of comparison. The human body might be considered quite simple one day.
Watch Jerry Springer and see for yourself.
There is no way an intelligent designer is responsible for that. Come on!
2006-08-09 01:15:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Real Friend 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutly!
No chance that One does not exist!
Every law in science says a higher force is required to cause order to exist.
Evolution, a theory, says very complex order and design came from nothing.
I'll believe the real science.
2006-08-09 01:26:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by jemhasb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont suppose its ever going to occur to your correspondents that 'Survial of the fittest' is pretty much an un attackable theory.
Every organism on the planet has adapted through mutation to compete and thrive in the prevailing environment; hence fish at the bottom of the oceons where there is no light, do not waste their energy through evolution by developing eyes, those that live closer to the surface do need eyes, hence they evolved with eyes.
Evolution/mutation is a natural process, is constantly carrying on around us, and is not the evidence of the existance or non existance of God that you seek.
If you want to find God, you need only refer to good ol' Bolean logic - God is a manifestation of faith. As long as a sentient being believes that by merely believing in God, God exists - then by definition - God exists Q.E.D.
2006-08-09 01:23:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chance.
Natural selection.
There are millions of different configurations; the bad ones die.
Never to be found.
Nothing was ever designed.
The concept of God is dead.
2006-08-09 01:15:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by sw21uk2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
By observing other varieties of life, and noting the order in which they appeared, I'd say the human body is the result of natural selection.
It's the simplest answer.
2006-08-09 01:12:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by silvercomet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say chance as I believe in the whole evolution thing, but hey that is just me. What do you think?
2006-08-09 05:33:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by megajen2000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
design
2006-08-09 04:04:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋