According to military testing it was higher than Kerry's!
By rates, interest, unemployment, home ownership(especially amongst minorities) is better than either Clinton or the most failed president ever...Carter!
With less percentage of the popular vote the Electoral College twice put Clinton into office than either election Bush won, the last with a near landslide victory. With Clinton the Dem's sang the praises of the College, with Bush it was out of date but they did not have the guts to start an amendment to change it from the Constitution did they!
2006-08-09 01:38:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush.. No way..
Check his approval level, it's getting into Nixon territory..
Any war against terror will fail so long as those fighting against it abide by any kind of rules of engagement or code of conduct.. It's been that way for thousands of years.. ask the Romans in the Tueteborg Forest.. Ask the British in the American Revolutionary war.. ask the Americans in Vietnam..
As for sent American soldiers to die.. being a former Marine, that is the duty of every member of the military, those who fail to realize that should not have volunteered, we hope it doesn;t happen, but know it could, I have a real distaste for those who enter the military, than cry about being sent into a war zone.. I have a much high respect for peace activists and those who refuse to serve, at least they are following their conscience..
Next point.. Americans have been hated all over the world since before Bush was born.. he isn't the cause, merely the current focal point..
Our allies.. no argument.. but anytime the French are allied with you, well.. you know..
2006-08-09 08:08:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by thorfin39 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
He is a wonderful president..and the reason people hate him, is that he is keeping all the scourge from attacking again. He did not 'fail' in economy, he did not fail in the war against terror,..he has captured so many terrorists and freed Iraqis and Afganis..Americans have always been the recievers of jealousy from other countries, but they are the same ones who always have their hands out to us for money anytime they call.....He has a higher I Q than you, I am sure, and also John Kerry, who you probably adore. I would say,...what are you doing here? Isn't it great to know that you can accuse our President falsely with nothing to back it up, and you won't get drawn and quartered?
2006-08-13 08:52:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by MotherKittyKat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he is jsut a little above average.....not even the highest IQ of the presidents.....the war against terror is not a 2 week war...and we ahve not failed.....there was WMDs, including 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium, and still being found today.......Indonesia was not an ally in the war, until Al-Qaeda struck out at them.....Terrorist are making our allies....The economy is the best it has been in over 50 years....For the first time in over 20 years, we are respected, not hated...though I will admit in many cases, that is a fine line.....anywa, get the facts straight, lemming
2006-08-09 08:10:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A recent informal, unscientific survey of historians conducted at my suggestion by George Mason University’s History News Network found that eight in ten historians responding rate the current presidency an overall failure. Of 415 historians who expressed a view of President Bush’s administration to this point as a success or failure, 338 classified it as a failure and 77 as a success. The past presidencies most commonly linked with the current administration include all of those that are usually rated as the worst in the nation’s history: Nixon, Harding, Hoover, Buchanan, Coolidge, Andrew Johnson, Grant, and McKinley.Several charges against the Bush administration arose repeatedly in the comments of historians who responded to the survey. Among them were: the doctrine of pre-emptive war, crony capitalism/being “completely in bed with certain corporate interests,” bankruptcy/fiscal irresponsibility, military adventurism, trampling of civil liberties, and anti-environmental policies.
2006-08-09 09:01:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by jdfnv 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would say he is not entirely stupid, more along the lines of a good salesman, and salesmen are generally salesmen because they cannot do anything else. He reminds me of the guy you never want to talk to on a carlot.
He is definetly lucky. Lucky that the American people have yet to look for truth about what happened on Sept. 11th. Cause you know, he has them brainwashed into thinking that anyone who questions it is a moron, an idiot or un-Patriotic.
2006-08-09 08:13:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd say you just made a good argument for him having the lowest IQ. Popularity and intelligence have nothing to do with each other. Maybe he's so popular because everyone else who has a low IQ is saying, "Ooooh! We have a president just like us!"
2006-08-09 08:15:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say YES because if anyone else had even tried to do what he was done for our nation in this time of crisis, we'd be screwed over.
And to the one who asked this question...the soldiers in Iraq are not fighting for nothing. They are fighting for the good of that country and they are fighting against people who could nuke the hell out of us and we'd be even more screwed.
2006-08-09 08:06:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by femaledrillsergeant 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate Bush and dont know or care what his IQ is, some people know that Dead Eye Dick Cheney pulls his strings anyway.
2006-08-14 13:36:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by shirley e 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
U make a good point, but i dont think he has the highest IQ in the US. There r ppl who go against him even in America. So those who go against him have a higher IQ than him. Thanks for ur enlightening question, and let there be victory for those who r against him.
2006-08-09 08:15:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋