That was something they used to show in carnival sideshows.
They used a mummified monkey or human body and a preserved alligator or fish, and showed it in dim lighting. I think there are a couple in the Smithsonian, complete with x-rays that show the wires and stuff that hold the two parts together.
2006-08-08 19:30:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nosy Parker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, you found this in the photobucket? Not in the Times, or the Trib? I mean, if it is such big news and all, and not a hoax.
Secondly, I don't think that creationists have a thing to worry about.
I googled tnajib, and found some interesting facts on your little "proof" of evolution, which this one is not.
It says that the photo was from this morning too, but the forum is talking about it in 1992? 2002? and 2003?
Maybe tourism is a little slow in Tan jib ???
If you observe closer around the shoulder area of the torso, there seems to be an irregular gap that does not blend naturally into the background
no one merged two corpses together- this photo is definitely a fake. how is it a fake? look at the focus on the crocodile section and then look at the focus on the 'man' section and you will see they are clearly from 2 different photos just photo shopped together. a really badly faked job in my opinion.
Anyone with half a brain would make sure they photographed the croc and the 'man' from the exact same distances and also the same lighting if possible. the problem then would be making the picture look a little bad so it wouldn’t be too good.
Right where the body changes, the arm is blocking it.
This picture appeared way back in Dec 1992 about fourteen times,
he is Jake the alligator man from marsh's free museum in Long beach.
People, please go to this link, and see for yourselves that this is a hoax. You will also note that he copied the article from the site, and also misspelled "warning", by spelling it "warring".
I copied some of the comments from the site in the same manner, but I at least corrected the spelling. Anyway, I thought the premise of the evolutionists was that we evolved from apes and monkeys, and not alligators? I guess the evolutionists know that their theory is totally full of holes, so they must stoop to the level of lieing. Real scientific.
Here's is some actual scientific knowledge that totally disproves evolution.
The most common blood type in humans is O.
The most common blood type in apes is B.
The most common blood type in chimps is A.
Apes and chimps have almost no O's at all.
That was backed up by the national blood bank.
www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t1157.html
2006-08-08 20:00:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by classyjazzcreations 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Half Man Half Lizard
2016-11-07 09:55:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are lists of fossils that are transitional between a primate ancestor and modern humans. When creationists look at the photos they claim that they are obviously either apes or humans, not anything in between, but the funny things is that no two of them agree on which is which. One creationist will say that a particular specimen is obviously a modern human with rickets and another will say that it's obviously an ape. There was a creationist who, during a debate with a scientist, was asked to draw what he thought a transitional skull between early ape and a human would look like. He drew it, probably assuming that no such thing existed, but the scientist produced a photograph of a skull that looked just like the drawing.
2016-03-14 02:12:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolutionists!
Evolving to the better and better being is evolution, for example man to human.
2006-08-08 19:42:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by peacemakers3000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huh, well now, that is something isn't it?! But of course, photo's are so unreliable because there are far too many ways to fix a pic to look like whatever you choose. But it is food for thought I suppose. lol
2006-08-08 19:32:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by bettywitdabigbooty 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gee...where have I seen that...on tv perhaps? Probably on that Ripley's Believe it or Not show as one of those old sideshow hoaxes.
You need more to do.
2006-08-08 19:37:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Indigo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK, I've looked at the shadows, and I repeat (since you've posted this before) great photoshopping.
2006-08-08 19:31:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you don't think with modern technology that shadows can be faked? Oh and one more thing who's evolving--reptiles or people?
2006-08-08 19:30:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by creative rae 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is obviously fake, look at his arm... it splits the body in 2. im not an evolutionist, but that pic is photoshoped, they arent even the same color... how do i know? because i know who made that pic!! ahaha loser....
2006-08-08 19:31:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋