Yes. Very dangerous, that guy.
2006-08-08 18:44:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr. Bush? How old is this point of view getting. Jesus, this is so much more black and white than we give it credit for. It is always in every wartime scenario, easy to blame the president for all of the woes of the world. However, here in America, (I have no idea what backwards country you come from) we have a system set up with what are called "checks and balances". Now do not assume I am ignorant enough to believe there are no flaws in this system, but it has been solid for some time now. So we have to place blame, if there is a reason to, on all members of our government, and those voters who elected them. The problem being with this statement is the fact they (and us the voters) are not wrong. I do not know how to state it properly. This is the Islamic version of the Crusades. They want any non-muslim dead or converted. This is the only way that their prophecies can be realized. Now the main problem we have failed to address is the fact that this point of view is MUCH more widespread than we normally vocalize. This is obviously due to the fact that none of us in the Western world want to be labeled bigots. But its true, many many many many Muslims believe this. This is taught in their schools, their homes, their media. This is a rhetoric spread much the same way Hitler spread his fanatical point of view. That was shrugged off intitally as well. Many other events had to take place to justify the full commitement of the American people and its so-called allies. If France were being overrun by Islamic Extremists they would look to us to help. Same goes for all of these other soft European countries. No one is our friend, our "ally" except Great Britain. We need to understand that and move on, which is what they are doing. The "sympathizers will spit thier b.s. and we will do what we have to do. I am proud to be American, and no matter how many conspiracy theories and ignorant sympathizers try to tell me we are the evil ones, I will continue to feel pride. We are a just people, we strive for equality. We are not imperialistic like many like to claim. We are not seeking to make everyone like us. We only seek to live our lives without the threat of others attacking us. We will defend that for as long as this country exists. World perception is interesting, it is amazing how people allow their governemts with their own agendas influence thier individual opinions. We did not let the Germans take your freedom. We did not let the Russians take your freedom. We will not let Islam take your freedom. We are on your side and one day you will realize this.
2006-08-08 19:07:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ryan 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
this is the first time i hear anything about this. if this is really right why didn't the media talk about it. why didn't the usa government say he kills civilians or u will tell me that they don't know.
in face i believe tha he is one of the greatest leaders in the world. he is a man that knows the value of his people and he is fighting very well and hard to make them raise their heads high and to get no orders from anybody.
i even wish that Mubarak ( I AM EGYPTIAN ) will either follow Ahmadinejad steps or step down for a new governing system in Egypt like Iran have. AMEN
2006-08-08 21:26:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Omar al-Bashir, Sudan. Age sixty two. In capability provided that 1989. final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days’s rank: a million provided that February 2003, Bashir’s marketing campaign of ethnic and non secular persecution has killed a minimum of a hundred and eighty,000 civilians in Darfur in western Sudan and pushed 2 million human beings from their residences. the best information is that Bashir’s military and the Janjaweed protection rigidity that he helps have all yet stopped burning down villages in Darfur. The undesirable information is why they’ve stopped: There are few villages left to burn. The assaults now are geared in direction of refugee camps. on a similar time as the media have called those strikes “a humanitarian tragedy,” Bashir himself has escaped significant condemnation. In 2005, Bashir signed a peace settlement with the main important insurrection team in non-Islamic southern Sudan and allowed its chief, John Garang, to grow to be the rustic’s vice chairman. yet Garang died in July in a helicopter crash, and Bashir’s troops nevertheless occupy the south.
2016-12-11 05:30:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes he's bad but in a way he is bringing Iran to power(from the Iranian perspective). People think that the middle east is bad africa is still much worse.
2006-08-08 18:45:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ahmadinejad has definitely earned the title as the most dangerous man in the world. And he is today's biggest threat to humanity.
He is this generation's Hitler.
2006-08-10 15:24:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by mo mosh 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes and if he continues his ways then Iran will most likely be destroyed by a future war between America and Iran
too bad Iran could be such a great country if its government wasnt so bad
2006-08-08 18:44:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am sure you know how – and at what cost – Israel was established:
-Many thousands were killed in the process.
-Millions of indigenous people were made refugees.
-Hundreds of thousands of hectares of farmland, olive plantations, townsand villages were destroyed.
This tragedy is not exclusive to the time of establishment; unfortunately it has been ongoing for sixty years NOW.
WHO IS WORST ?
2006-08-08 18:52:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush and Ahmadinejad and Saddam are same same .............No.1 Terrorist Mr.Bush
2006-08-08 18:46:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by mmosafir 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
he is only a puppet of the current Ayatollah.
2006-08-08 18:43:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Norman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋