What do you think? Are the dams on the Columbia River worth the cost of not allowing these beautiful fish to survive? I'm a fisherman and try to see both sides, but the more I look at the power created by the dams that seems to only benifit a few I wonder, and the loss of money in the States that depend on the fish for the revenue, I wonder what is the best thing to do? what do you think? Should the dams be breached or let them stay as is?
2006-08-08 18:34:32 · 3 answers · asked by basscatcher 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Well, we could have BOTH with the construction of a fish ladder, but that would cost quite a hefty sum.
2006-08-08 18:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by chris 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before you want to ask an insightful question, consider how much more respect you would garner if you knew how to spell "their."
2015-12-13 05:25:31 · answer #2 · answered by Matching Ts 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let them find a home in my belly!!!!!!
2006-08-08 18:42:14 · answer #3 · answered by Steel Toe 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋