2006-08-08 18:31:29 · 5 answers · asked by Brian M 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
NEW YORK TIMES
2006-08-08 18:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by yoyo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
New York Times has a better team. Writers normally present only one side of picture and some times are biased.
2006-08-09 01:49:27 · answer #2 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I cannot really comment on the LA Times, not having read the paper, but their website is interesting. NY Times? I do not have access to it either, but I do get the International Herald Tribune that is put out by them, and it is GOOD. I can pick it up again days later and still read it and find it interesting, unlike many dailies. So my current vote is for the NY Times.
2006-08-09 01:55:16 · answer #3 · answered by stacey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NY Times sets the example and is followed by most other papers. So, it appears they are all saying the same thing.. This is the reason both papers mentioned, are having circulation problems and are laying off workers.
2006-08-09 03:41:28 · answer #4 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both papers are liberal propaganda rags. get an unbiased point of view, or loose subscribers.
2006-08-09 01:39:55 · answer #5 · answered by Kathy O 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋