English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-08 18:06:02 · 29 answers · asked by LondonLou 3 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

29 answers

wasn`t she adopted by Angelina Jolie?

2006-08-08 18:19:19 · answer #1 · answered by Your best friend 6 · 2 0

For the most part Tom Cruise sat still and faced the hard questions from Diane Sawyer on ABC News' Primetime last night. There was no fist pumping or couch jumping as Mr. Cruise fielded one hardball after another from a well-prepared Ms. Sawyer.

Yet despite talking candidly about sex (he's in favor of it) and Catholic baptism (he's not), Mr. Cruise declined to answer questions regarding the baby's name, sex, or astrological sign. Nevertheless, Postcards from the Pug Bus' astrological research department has been able to confirm that baby L. Ron (or L. Ronnette) will be an Aries if s/he's born before midnight April 19.

Had Mr. Cruise elected to speak openly about Scientology horoscopes, he would have revealed that they are predicated on the relationship between small appliances and zodiac signs. The founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard, believed that the quickest way to get rich was to start your own religion. Second and third on his list were selling small appliances door to door and starting your own astrological forecast. He preached that people should open their minds and wallets to the voices of small appliances, especially if their old small appliances were hissing or emitting sparks.

2006-08-08 18:10:55 · answer #2 · answered by JJ 4 · 0 0

Haha! Only other Scienos, like Jenna Elfman, have apparently seen this "baby." My guess is, it doesn't exist, or it's got some ridiculous health problem, probably caused by Tom's wacky use of the radioactive sonogram machine at home! Of course, Scientology doesn't believe in sicknesses, because they think everything can be cured with Scieno techniques and vitamins, apparently. So the poor baby, if real, is probably suffering somewhere. As is Katie, who is apparently experiencing post-partum depression. (Vitamins, Katie, don't you know?)

Their whole relationship is a farce. I'm sad for Katie. She used to be normal. Now crazy Scienos have her cornered, most likely drugged, and blackmailed.

2006-08-08 18:12:56 · answer #3 · answered by ear help! 3 · 0 0

I haven't. Ever since the Scientology thing, we don't talk much anymore. Those chosen few who have actually seen the baby use words like "gorgeous." I mean, they are two good looking parents; so logically their baby will be as well. As for the press, no pics yet.

2006-08-08 18:11:44 · answer #4 · answered by Michael R 4 · 0 0

Suri is being kept secluded in their home, per the rituals of Scientology. The same thing was done with Tom's older children.

2006-08-08 18:09:47 · answer #5 · answered by The Apple Chick 7 · 0 0

It's weird. Some celebrities show them off and even ofer money to
the highest bidder and others hide them to no end. All I know is
that for someone who wanted to tell the world when they first got
engaged it seems a little weird that he is hiding out now.

2006-08-08 18:31:07 · answer #6 · answered by sally 3 · 0 0

Yep! It's at the Toronto Zoo living in the monkey cage and trying to convince it's fellow primates to take up scientology.
Like father...like child.
But hey! It's a paycheck!

2006-08-08 18:27:10 · answer #7 · answered by krazykritik 5 · 0 0

I don't believe that anyone (outside of close family) have seen Suri. Maybe someday we will.

Have a lovely rest of the evening.

2006-08-08 18:11:27 · answer #8 · answered by Goblin g 6 · 0 0

Damn Stalker... Can U Let The Poor People ( not literally lol ) Rest In Peace.. Gee

2006-08-08 18:09:58 · answer #9 · answered by got_milk_its_dairy 2 · 0 0

I don't think anyone has outside of family and hospital staff. They actually have a count of how long it's been since she was born and no one has seen her.

2006-08-08 18:09:59 · answer #10 · answered by *AstrosChick* 5 · 0 0

In my opinion I do not think it's the Scientology thing. I believe that there might be something wrong with her, although that would not be anything to be ashamed of.

2006-08-08 18:13:29 · answer #11 · answered by beachdiva954 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers