doesn't it make sense to do experiment testing on humans.Not Innocent animals?

Question

Alot of humans would volunteer ...think of it we humans already abuse our bodys with drugs and std's ............and wild animals are just are trying to make it and raise their family ......while we bully them for are selfish needs.....what if it were the other way around

Answer 1

What if there wernt no expiraments at all? That would be alot better no human or animal needs to be tested on. If anything let them get cadaver body's from the morge if that would work if their body was donated to science or something.

Answer 2

Well there are a ton of legal issues as well as ethical ones. For example the FDA strictly regulates ANY clinical testing. That is testing on humans. To make a long explanation short testing on humans is way to expensive. It is also a lot slower in many cases as mice have a much higher metabolism and they experience the effects of toxic levels of drug dosage that is need for the therapeutic index much faster. They also inject thousands of times the normal dose for humans in animals and sometimes test them in the thousands. So we can get a decade worth of data in a couple of months if they are zealous enough. Frankly put it all comes done to whether you want humans to have medicine that could save lives or save the lives of animals that wouldn't even be alive without us. I know what you would probably choose but some people might think that a human's health is more important than an animal's health.

Answer 3

It would be unethical and illegal to endanger humans to experiments without animal testing first. Humans are put through clinical trials for new medications all the time. Most animals that are utilized to testing are domestic not wild. There are plenty of cosmetics these days that don't use animal testing at all. Many human beings don't abuse their bodies with drugs or STD's. Have a great day.

Answer 4

No, the animals rights crowd is an even worse threat to research than the no stem-cell nuts. Do you really think people would volunteer to become paraplegics for spinal cord injury research?

Answer 5

Not only volunteers, but we have prisons full of people just sitting around not doing anything. Might as well make them useful for something.

Answer 6

I agree, there are groups of volunteers standing in lines everywhere....Particularly at the local plasma centers near university neighborhoods..I know they would be willing to donate their time to the grand interest of the american Experiment..... Kudos , I wish there were more people like you who are predesposed to thinking the way you do .. I'd vote for you in a heart beat... Kudos to your educators.......

Answer 7

Damn What kind of dope are you animal rights nuts on ? I love animals myself and have a few of them I do agree some of the tests they do on them could probably be done a better way but you folks are just whacked

Answer 8

I think were innocent animals ourselves just trying to make is and raise our families too. Death row people should be the ones to have to do this.

Answer 9

What would be best is to not test on either humans or animals, just use materials we already know to be safe.

Answer 10

Yes....I think there was a specific case involved in animal testing-thalidomide-that proved disastrous for pregnant mothers that was initially tested on animals...Not certain of the particulars.

But, yes...condemned killers...serial killers...should be experimented on...if nothing more, tested....DNA analysis...etc...