Alot of humans would volunteer ...think of it we humans already abuse our bodys with drugs and std's ............and wild animals are just are trying to make it and raise their family ......while we bully them for are selfish needs.....what if it were the other way around
2006-08-08 17:28:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
yes... instead of putting death convicts to death sentence.. the judge will say.. i sentenced you to become a TEST SUBJECT for a lifetime...
then that would be fair....
2006-08-08 17:34:24 · answer #1 · answered by Ian C 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, you are wrong. Medicines and surgical techniques need to be tested on animal models before they can ever be ready for human subject trial. Do you really think the life of a lab rat is equivalent to a human life?
2006-08-09 00:33:11 · answer #2 · answered by Spreet 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I so agree with you. Why put innocent animals through testing and stuff. People already like to do abusive things to their body's so why not be used for guinea pigs instead of animals, you are so right!! Plus people would want to do it if they knew they would get paid for it, right?
2006-08-09 00:41:12 · answer #3 · answered by allyson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
However, I got a bottle of pet shampoo and it said it wasn't tested on animals. How in the world do they know it gives pets coat a silky sheen if they never tested it on a pet?!? Maybe I'm just misinformed about what animal testing consists of, but you'd think they'd test pet shampoo on a pet.
2006-08-09 00:35:47 · answer #4 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alot of humans would expect to be paid for time (i know I would). Its cheaper and more cost effective to do it on animals. Sad but true.
2006-08-09 00:34:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are yu volunteering??? We spend lots of money to save the animals and kill our babies, so why would what you suggest be strange.. Volunteer and save a fish..
2006-08-09 00:33:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes because it's more effective but then what if it kills the humans thats why we test on animals for side effects first
2006-08-09 00:34:01 · answer #7 · answered by working mom 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but that would be inhuman, instead of merely inhumane. (Sorry, it had to be said. Honestly, I think you're right.)
2006-08-09 00:33:30 · answer #8 · answered by spunk113 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why don't you sign up ???
2006-08-09 00:37:54 · answer #9 · answered by fancy_sweet_heart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋