Usually this is considered an act of God, so I guess that's who you should sue. Just kidding. The comprehensive portion of your car insurance normally covers this. The only way you could get something from the tree owner would be if you could demonstrate that the tree was in danger of falling (dead branches) and the owner was negligent.
2006-08-08 13:51:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by just♪wondering 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mother Nature..
In some cases, the home owner may have insurance to help pay for damages.. but then again..
what caused the tree to hit your car..
Do you have insurance on your car.. your insurance should cover it.. and if not, they'll find out who is responsible..
did you file a report with the police..
If the tree belongs to the city.. call city hall
2006-08-08 13:51:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by sassy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your car was struck by a tree in your yard coming from a neighbors yard, there home owners should pay if the top of the tree was over the property line. Need more info on what happened, hope it hits home!
2006-08-08 13:51:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by edgarrrw 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're to blame on your vehicle and your insurance follows that vehicle . if the park brake replaced into on guide transmission or computerized transmission then the question is were your doorways locked and replaced into the park brake on at the same time as it replaced into up hostile to the tree and replaced into it totally utilized, did you chorus from touching the vehicle till police arrived , did you get a police record ? . this all makes a huge difference yet nonetheless may no longer substitute a ingredient . for instance , if the vehicle replaced into unlocked , it is your duty to fasten it or someone can benefit get acceptable of entry to to it and launch the park brake as a shaggy dog tale . that's your fault , you spot anybody can say something they prefer besides the undeniable fact that the actuality is , that's nonetheless your duty . in case you probably did not set the park brake in any get at the same time no matter if it replaced into an computerized transmission, it is your fault. an insurance employer has heard all sorts of reports and this one is not any distinct . human beings can make a mistake yet do not favor to confess so that they might sense susceptible to make up a narrative . the insurance employer doesnt care . your vehicle would have rolled into the line and killed someone . in reality , you should take duty on your vehicle at the same time as it truly is on your area meaning it replaced into no longer stolen and also you've been the finest one to park it , also no matter if some different person parked alongside with a chum , it is your duty . I advise having the park brake regarded at and or utilizing wheel chocks because you're on a hill or have an susceptible driveway and continuously lock your doorways
2016-11-23 16:44:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In this scenerio, no one is at fault. This is what insurance companies call an "act of God". Although, if the tree was rotten in any way, and the owner of that tree knew it was rotten, the tree owner is at fault.
2006-08-08 13:50:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ricknows 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it is the trees fault!! It should have gotten out of the way.
2006-08-08 13:48:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by catsrule!! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mother Nature
2006-08-08 13:48:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
who evers property the tree is on is at fault.
(like if your car was parked on a public street and the neighbors tree fell on your car..it'd be their fault)
2006-08-08 13:55:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by mommy2savannah51405 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the tree is standing outside of the fence (Public sidewalk), it the responsibility of the of the local government. If inside the perimeter fence of a particular property), the owner.
2006-08-08 13:50:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sam X9 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
im thinking that its your car hit the tree
2006-08-08 13:48:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by ningy_2004 2
·
0⤊
0⤋