Anarchism really isn't realistic in any capicity, the real "anarchist" would be better off voting Libertarian as they are for minimal government control.
2006-08-08 13:17:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Black Sabbath 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
7
2006-08-11 18:23:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think anarchist, or rather anarcho-syndicalist to be specific, comes closest to what I believe. I believe that employees running corporations democratically is the best way to ensure those doing the work are properly rewarded. I believe direct action is much more practical than voting or protesting in bringing about the kind of change you want. I believe there's much to be said about direct democracy as a solution to political corruption. I believe decentralized democracy (or at least decisions made by those most affected by the decisions) is the best way to both ensure individual rights and preserve government by the people.
2006-08-10 12:43:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by cyu 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Betrand Russell discusses anarchy in his book Roads To Freedom. V interesting.
2006-08-08 13:32:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i used to consider myself an anarchist, but then i realized that "anarchy" as a concept is too hard to pin down, as far as deciding what it really is, or if it could ever be achieved. of course, it wouldn't be anarchy, if it had a universally accepted definition...
2006-08-08 13:27:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by list 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anarchists are sufferer of Homophobia, schizophrenia
2006-08-10 19:04:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you mean :
Ana=without-
chist= Chef
We are ruled by evil mens. We just need to think for ourself.
2006-08-10 14:37:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you had anarchy you would have no government regulating distribution and sales, so you would have no material possesions.
Retard.
2006-08-08 13:20:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by gurevich29 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I AM A CHRISTIAN...HELP
2006-08-08 19:16:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by hisahito 5
·
0⤊
0⤋