which u.s. presidenent is bad?

Answer 1

George W. Bush

Answer 2

I assume that your intention is to rate your presidents from a local perspective, but since I'm not from the US and I live outside of the US, let me answer from a Latin American perspective.
In principle US presidents do not come with an agenda that should show some respect to Latin America. So I might say that all of them are bad. However, this would be a blanket statement. It's easier to say which ones have engaged Latin American in a less patronizing manner. Good presidents have been John F Kennedy (although his short sightedness led to the alienation of Cuba...bad move), Jimmy Carter (the best by far) and Bill Clinton. In hindsight I appreciate that Franklin D. Roosevelt used his influence to discourage the Latin American elites from lending support to the Nazis. Too bad you guys didn't elect Al Gore. The worst: Ronald Reagan, and from the bottom up George Bush Sr., Richard Nixon, George W Bush.

Answer 3

Every single Us President, but Lincoln and Kennedy, were all Illuminatis, Usa faction members of the Skull and Bone Clan, the Death Clan (Lodge 322)

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Patriot Act : http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/default.html
The Bush's helped finance the Waffen SS and SA.
The Bush family has had dealings with Saddam Hussein involving oil drilling and real estate.
The Bush family has connections to the Bin Laden family. This includes a close partnership in the Carlyle group and Arbusto oil. The Bin Ladens and the Bush's have had a long close relationship.
However I don't know if they actually had money taken away being the Bush family has been known to bribe politicians.
t's funny how the Bush family has business dealings with people and governments who kill Americans. The people who are the biggest threat to our national security are friends and partners with the Bush's.
Makes you wonder who's side the Bush's are on.http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww...

Answer 4

Andrew Jackson
Ronald Reagan
GH Bush
GW Bush
Herbert Hoover
Harry Truman

Answer 5

Franklyn W. Yo-ho-Ha, who reigned from 2010 to 2040. He captured the White House by riding up on his camel and swung his scimitar about until there was no more to swing at.

He will go down in history as the President who wanted everyone to like everyone else and he made it a law that citizens had to smile all day. He put sensors and cameras everywhere ( even in toilets ) so that his minions could watch to see if anyone stopped smiling.

Yes, Franklyn W. Yo-ho-Ha was so bad that the word "yohoha" became synonymous with the word "bad". Mothers have used that word when they punished their children.

Answer 6

All Carter did was to de-regulate gas with phase in period to let market forces work use excess profits to set up super fund. Deregulate trucking industry and airline industry. Actuary make SS sound while adding cost of living.Develop the weapons over republican protest that won first gulf war, while being fiscally sound. One gave Reagan seven trillion dollars to flush on one covert activity. See Bob Woodward's first edition of VALE Secret CIA War. Clinton gave Bush sound economy and balance budget to pay his war games So I guess both. If you need just one than vote for Clinton for letting gas companies conglomerate again.

Answer 7

None of them in my opinion.I really do not understand why people wants to be a hot shot.He only gets less than $200.000 per year for his salary.Everyday he have to hear the world problems as well as Domestic problems.He has no life and less time with the family.Everyday he reads the newspaper he gets heart burned suddenly someone never appreciate what he does,and attacks him with nasty words and pick the most of his ugly picture to print.Then the tabloid explored negative story which is not totally true but the public will read them anyway.He can not say much because,his so call ad visors will prohibit him for his opinion.Everything around him are for show instead of living.He has to behave at all time and he can not flirt around beautiful women except his ugly wife. He can not sip Star Buck and surf Yahoo in a road side Cafe.(no fun ) Everywhere he goes he has to be ready for someone trying to harm him,well I really do not get it and name and fame to him he can not trade for money or food.well anyone being choose to I bet he is happy what is he doing?

Answer 8

I am from middle east that is why i'll essess according to US policy in our area.We as people of middle east we do not have any problem with American peiple.We know the American people are not interested in American foreign policy-they care just about domestic affairs and the majority are misled by the media which represent an opinion of afew.
We has always expected America to play a balanced role in the area since it has much interests in Arab countries.We expected it to be fair and justice.Just a few days America supplied Israel with smart bombs to kill civiilians(childern,women,elderly) and hindered any attempt calling for cease fire-it supported the killing of innocent people.
Definitely Bush is the worest.We consider him as the president of war.

Answer 9

Gotta have someone to blame for the mess the US is in, has been in, and will be in....... Most noted: Andrew Johnson, Carter, Nixon/Ford, Clinton, and George W. Jr., will probably get dealt the low card. As for our future, I'm sure there will be just about as much wrong with the President as we have discovered wrong in the past.

Answer 10

Do we have more than one currently?

All of them have made mistakes, some worse than others. But there are only really two standards by which they can reasonably be judged. What were their motives (goals) and what means did they use to achieve them.

Bush arguably might have valid goals. His policies to preserve national security might actually be based on a desire to keep this country safe. Or they might simply be based on his desire to control everything for his own private agenda. That part we won't be able to evaluate well, except in hindsight.

As to means, some of his actions might have been good attempts, and some might have been foolish mistakes. And again, many of those we'll only be able to evaluate in hindsight.

But regardless of what else can be said about Bush, there is this. He has admitted to countless willful violations of federal laws, betrayed his oath to support and defend the constitution, and has committed war crimes (as defined in 18 USC 2441 under federal law). To me, that's bad.

Answer 11

Andrew Jackson