English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is a bunch of non sense to blame him for everything. Bush and im sure the rest of the democratic countries didn't want this to happen.

2006-08-08 12:52:11 · 15 answers · asked by Ah Ha 3 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

The buck stops at the top...

2006-08-08 12:56:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Isn't it funny that if Bush got anything right the same people whining about how he's blamed for everything negative would be jumping for joy. Yes, he is the man at the top and as the President of the most powerful nation his opinion is expected to carry considerable weight. That he has failed so miserably in this task only shows that change is needed. Isn't it funny that when it came to invading Afghanistan and later Iraq, he nor his administration couldn't say one nice thing about the French but now that he's got his tail in a jam in his support for Israel he goes to the French to develop a resolution to the conflict. Does no one see him for what he is - opportunistic with no true foundation than serving his own cause at all cost.

2006-08-08 13:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by Sonie 5 · 0 1

As the leader of the free world you accept that fact when you run for president. If you can't stand the heat get out of the fire. He is more worried about riding his bike then what is happening in the world. He's a phony, always was and always will be. Cheney has been in power since day one and he also knows how to hide when the sh*t hits the fan. It is part of the job to take the heat when things go wrong. This administration blames everyone but themselves. People who don't do anything think they have not done anything wrong. Sorry, it is a misconception on their part.

2006-08-08 13:08:06 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 0 1

The Middle East is a mess entirely created by US and European foreign policy negligence and weak leadership in the region itself. Without these factors, there would be no Hassan Nusrallah or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The West, by not confronting Israeli policy in an authentic or balanced manner, or by helping to impose a negotiated peace agreement, inadvertently set in motion a very predictable outcome which is manifested in the conflict that has transpired during the last two weeks!

2006-08-08 14:48:05 · answer #4 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 0 0

On a Global scale the President of the United States is the easiest target.

Some people never look for the truth they just throw stones (at a easy target of course)

Go big Red Go

2006-08-08 13:18:14 · answer #5 · answered by 43 5 · 0 0

It's an election year with democrats out of power. Expect them to pull any and every trick in the book to get some of that power back.

2006-08-08 12:57:39 · answer #6 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 1 0

When all is not right with the world it is easy to blame the United States.

2006-08-08 12:56:47 · answer #7 · answered by ramblin guy 4 · 1 0

Because Bush is igniting these wars .......sending smart bombs to the Israelis ... and blankets to the Lebanese children (to be scattered with an american-made F-18)


ALL IN ALL he is the head of the snake

2006-08-08 13:07:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Its bull. Apparently all war is America's fault. The middle east is always innocent.
Its unfair that America has been used as a global scapegoat.

2006-08-08 13:00:46 · answer #9 · answered by gurevich29 2 · 0 0

Well, for at least the ones that the US is directly involved it, because he's the Commander-in-Sheik.

He's in ultimate command of the troops that went to Afghanistan and Iraq. So, who else should be held responsible for what happens to them?

2006-08-08 12:57:50 · answer #10 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

then why was he involved in getting syria to leave lebanon? everyone predicted that lebanon would have a hard time stepping up to keep order when they left... and bush championed the fledgling democracy there in february of 05.

now he is giving israel the tools to keep blowing them up. that seems a little schizo in light of his involvement. he may not have wanted it to happen but he is not blameless.

2006-08-08 12:59:55 · answer #11 · answered by uncle osbert 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers