I've been questioning the validity of such a claim for the past two days. Many people have insulted my intelligence and asked me why I didn't read what some Scientist's websight said. Well, I'll tell you that I did, and that's where the problem started.
I've always found it odd how there could be so much fact and so many equasions and so much information based on studying Filter #3 from telescope images. I've gotten to the point where I don't believe anything that science decrees that I can't do the math for in my own head. Much like anything else, I aknowledge that there is eventually a point where the Universe's complexity will leave me in it's wake, but I seriously doubt that it will start at a place beyond where I predicted.
I spent the past 48 hours being ridiculed by people that think I am stupid for saying a Black Hole is a collapsed star. Most of them are obviously convinced that Science is a collection of LAWS, not theories. I don't doubt all I read, just the outlandish.
2006-08-08 11:35:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
To Mai Tai Mike:
Hey, Stupid. I'm not the one that is saying that crap. I'm the one that is saying that it's a load of crap. See what happens when you open your big fat mouth. It turns out that you agree with me. I'm just curious.... did you want to?
2006-08-09 05:07:14 · update #1
"I spent the past 48 hours being ridiculed by people that think I am stupid for saying a Black Hole is a collapsed star."
What ???!!! Of course a BH is a collapsed star. That's like astronomy 101.
I don't know what kind of "portal" a BH could be, when anything material that fell into one would be ripped apart by gravitational tides. Furthermore, noone knows what will happen inside one, because there's no assurance that the laws of physics work inside of a black hole.
"Laws" ARE theories. They are collections of observations that haven't been refuted. That doesn't mean they couldn't be refuted. Which is why there is *no such thing as a proof* in science. Anyone who tells you otherwise needs to study more.
2006-08-08 23:31:04 · answer #1 · answered by Luis 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I suppourt you! There is no such thing as a "portal" or "wormhole" it is simply a superdense singularity of matter. Yes, it is a collapsed star. Wormholes and portals are the stuff of science-fiction. Who would ridicule you when all of these morons are half-brained nerds living in their mother's basement, when you acutally have some logical theory and scientific fact? There's my question. I'm sorry, but I think whoever thought that black holes were portals are full of it and need to spend more time examining the facts and gathering more info before coming to such a drastic conclusion. White holes, HA. Do we have sufficient information? NO. Is an exploding star creating a black hole, a super powerful gravitational attraction a plausible scientific theory? Yes, in fact it is the strongest theory, and the most reasonably logical one. If I'm wrong, woops. But for now, I am on your side.
2006-08-08 19:09:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe your the smart one. But Maybe not. Find evidence and then you'll show them, otherwise they'll find evidence and show you.
I'll show you!!!!
Theres a book at my libary I don't remeber what it was called or who it was by but it had equations that actually showed you how to work out that the black hole could possibly 66% be a portal. There were different types of black holes the normal ones (the ones you belive in) and a ring kind, and a 3d hole. The ring and the 3d one acted as portals.
Quantum mechanics also says there is stuff in even the smallest places so maybe in an infinetly small space there is an infinite amount of matter.
2006-08-08 18:42:34 · answer #3 · answered by Darth Futuza 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi. Spectral analysis can demonstrate and measure the orbital speed of gases as they approach an object with gravity. They do this by measuring the emission lines of, say, hydrogen. A black hole causes the emission lines to blur due to the fact that some of the light is approaching us and some is receding. This is geometry. (Does not work if the black hole's axis of rotation is facing us.) The measurement can demonstrate orbital speed of the gas. Very useful. It does not, and cannot in my opinion, demonstrate that a portal, wormhole, time tunnel, or any other phenomenon exists.
2006-08-08 18:48:15 · answer #4 · answered by Cirric 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are clearly making this stuff up. There are no stellar black holes that can be seen by a telescope. So "studying Filter #3 from telescope images" only occurs in your imagination.
Refusing to accept any truth that requires mathematical skills greater than what you can now do in your head will leave you very ignorant of the nature of the universe.
2006-08-08 18:58:43 · answer #5 · answered by Mai Tai Mike 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm. thought provoking. It's a good question, now you got ME wondering! Thank you for the question!
2006-08-08 18:42:43 · answer #6 · answered by Jeff M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋