2006-08-08 11:17:07 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
When I separate the person from who they are, i.e. a body part, that person has an incredible bottom, or they are hot, I am separating the person from who they are to how they appear/look. I am also idealizing who they are based on the objectification of their body, i.e., because that person is hot, I would like to get to know them, or somehow they are appealing emotionally mentally because they are hot. As I am objectifying, lust shows itself in fantasy. What would I like, what would I like to do with and to them. So I would say when the idealized picture of this person is replaced with reality, IE., who they really are. You can accept and be willing to see past faults, issues, problems because Love carries no jealousy, love doesn't judge, love don't do anything for self gratitude, love gives unconditionally, love is trust, love is respect, love is truth!
2006-08-11 02:15:29 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Exactly. Nature is the greatest teacher. Progeny is the aim of each species in nature. To achieve that goal, certain physical action backed by psychological reaction is quite essential. Without procreation, life would be incomplete. Lust should be kept for fulfilling the need of procreation. When that goal is achieved, love should be continued with no lust. Love should be a permanent but lust temporary. Then only human race would continue with peace and happiness.
2006-08-08 18:31:08 · answer #2 · answered by SRIRANGAM G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust pretty much but love comes in all shapes and sizes ie. you don't feel that for your Mother? Sis? When your wife is 60 you won't be too concerned about procreating and that's about the best love at the end of the day, except maybe kids.
2006-08-08 18:25:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't at all. Love and Lust are two different things and are meant to create different outlooks . Lust is just as it is, Lust . Love is meant to be for people who really care for each other to have a wonderful life together and then procreate .
2006-08-08 18:23:31 · answer #4 · answered by StarShine G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love is totally opposite of lust. You can lust after someone who you have no feelings for. To love someone is giving them a special place in your heart and soul even if it is just for a moment.
You should procreate only if you are truly planning on spending your life with the individual that love.
2006-08-08 18:23:44 · answer #5 · answered by Fefe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not "just a trick," but it is definitely Mother Nature's way. She is pro-procreation.
2006-08-08 18:22:29 · answer #6 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love and lust aren't a trick of nature, they just are nature. deal with it.
2006-08-08 18:21:14 · answer #7 · answered by Alysse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I was fooled by mother nature in that way, I am happy about that trick played on me.
2006-08-08 18:23:33 · answer #8 · answered by laughsall 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure they are--you say that as if it's a bad thing. You probably wouldn't exist if it weren't for both of them. Lust on your daddy's part, and love on your mommy's, more likely than not.
2006-08-08 18:26:17 · answer #9 · answered by homebuyer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trick of nature or God's divine plan? Who cares? It's all fun.
2006-08-08 18:21:27 · answer #10 · answered by Dave 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋