This was a key point of the Defense, "If the glove doesn't fit, it proves he's not the killer"
Please keep in mind, OJ is an actor.
The glove was tight to begin with, let alone what a dried blood drenched glove might do.
OJ had his fingers outstreched through the entire demonstration.
He was wearing a latex glove to begin with.
The Jury was led on to believe that the glove didn't fit ~well (though he did still manage to get it on).
This was a hugh win for the defense.
How were we all duped on this? Your thoughts on all this please.
2006-08-08 11:10:34 · 9 answers · asked by blphnx 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I'm with you on the glove. When I saw him trying on the glove, I knew it had shriveled because of the blood on it. And he was wearing a latex glove which took up space. That whole incident in the courtroom was an effing farce.
Funny though, everytime I see his face in the news or hear his name, my mind always goes back to that scene of him trying on HIS glove.
2006-08-08 12:56:18 · answer #1 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
After he (OJ) tried them on on the trial (blunder) the prosecutor delivered interior the glove maker. Who had a sparkling pair of gloves the comparable length because of the fact the Blood Stained gloves. they had O.J. attempt Them on, and no one recollects this? properly, young infants those glove fit completely.
2016-11-04 03:58:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He had arthritis, and his hands were swollen. Plus, it was a great acting job.
"We" weren't all duped on this; the jury was.
Read Bugliosi's great "Outrage" to see how the prosecution completely bungled this case.
2006-08-08 11:16:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The actual quote was, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit." Of course he was guilty and the glove demonstration was a farce.
2006-08-08 11:15:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He had a lot of money he was famous and he got away with murder. Check it out there has never been an actor/actress charged with the crime of murder to ever be found guilty.
2006-08-08 12:29:56 · answer #5 · answered by jane d 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WOW, YOU ARE WAY BEHIND THE TIMES... THE O.J. THING WENT OUT WITH COWBOYS AND INDIANS... TIME TO MOVE INTO THE 2000'S...
2006-08-08 11:16:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It took you all these years to figure this out?
2006-08-08 11:15:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
oj who
2006-08-08 11:24:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
why is this still being talked about?
2006-08-08 11:16:36 · answer #9 · answered by tottasis 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋