If the law was changed,?

Question

And presidents could have a third term, who would win? Bill Clinton or George Bush and why.

Gee I didn't ask if neither would win, shows how stupid some people are, I guess.

Answer 1

Clinton would win. He is a much better campaigner and just as good a political mind as Bush.
There is also one other reason. He is popular in Arkansas, Iowa and New Mexico. These are states the the President won by narrow margins. All he would have to do is add these to the Kerry states and the total is enough to win the presidency.

Answer 2

Bill Clinton, easily. He may not be the best husband in the world, but he was a brilliant president. He unified people, rather than dividing them as George Bush does. He's an extremely smart man, and a good leader of people.

Answer 3

Unfortunately, George Bush would win because of all the greedy, wealthy and non to bright people out there. Bill Clinton should be the winner, because we have not had such a good economy as we have had during his term. Like his father before him, George II is blind to what the average person is going thru

Answer 4

Bill Clinton - in a land slide.

Unfortunately, it would be for all the wrong reasons. I actually
liked Clinton quite a bit, but people would be thinking quite
simply of the economy during his term and the current President's
failings (Katrina, Iraq).

I would *MUCH* rather see an ideological debate between
real, intelligent contemplative members of the factions than
sound-bite mania.

Answer 5

I would vote for an independant candidate, if I voted that is (choose not to), for the fact that Clinton could have stopped Bin Laden a long time ago, but didnt. Instead he wanted to keep peace, guess that came back to bite him in the butt.

With Bush, personally speaking my brother was in Iraq, and was injured, speaking to him and a lot of his military buddies they all agreed that it was bull that they had to be over there. And I would have to agree.

Why do we keep playing peace-keeper? At the same time why do many feel it necessary to have a war? Guess thats why I am glad to be an anarchist.

Answer 6

Clinton would have hands down, even with the BJ...That sure would have solved all of the Conservatives talking about Clinton's private parts for 10 years. Get over it Neocons Clinton is a man!!! World wide!!!

Answer 7

Bill Clinton would win hands down, and almost irrespective of his platform. To speak to Bill is to have him look you in the eye and to act as if you were the most important person in the world and that he has a need for your opinions. We have met him twice.

Quite apart from his personality he masters the issues. That he was less than successful in many or most of his projects is a tragedy, but cannot be blamed on him. (The greatest tragedy is the fault of Yassir Arafat, finally rejecting the Oslo Agreement.)

I do not see George W. Bush's followers as expressing either affection or respect for him. Rather, their loyalty is one of pure politics, religious persuasion, or misapprehension as to where there interests lie. (There is no doubt that in Mormon country and in much of Evangelical country, people are loyal to GWB. But so many of the issues that underpin his political success are peripheral and anomalous: abortion, guns, prayer in schools, gay marriage.)

Answer 8

bill clinton CAN run again but he has set his sights higher, and thankfully out of this country, to the UN.
In both of clintons elections, neither of which were landslides, the conservative voting block was split do the the presence of "the little general" perot and so only got 45% of the vote. clinton would lose in a race against any conservative unless they(the dems) tried the perot stunt again.

Answer 9

Neither. Both outlived their usefulness. Clinton in his second term & Bush in his first (but since the Dems made the bonehead choice of John Kerry Bush won again).

Answer 10

Clinton, without a doubt. He got the country out of debt, he didn't convince our nation to go to war based on his lies, and he was able to speak like someone with an education. None of those things can be said about our current president.