back in 2004, if the deal was shaq for odom, butler, grant, and wade which could have been considered. how would both teams look right now? would miami win the championship? would wade still be as good? would wade play point or back up for kobe? and would phil still coach the 04-05 year?
2006-08-08 09:49:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
why in the hell did you ask so many unanswerable questions. you have too much time on your hands. go get a girlfriend.
2006-08-08 09:56:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Heat would still be good, but not good enough to get far in the playoffs. The Lakers would be awesome. With D-Wade at PG and Kobe at SG . . . that would be one of the deadliest duo's in NBA history. Once they got some chemistry going they would win some rings. What team would have two guards that good on the SAME TEAM to defend Wade and Kobe? Teams wouldn't be able to defend them BOTH. Phil still wouldn't have been the coach because he didn't like Kobe.
2006-08-08 17:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The point of trading is to get players that you need. It would never happen because a team that has Kobe doesn't need Wade.
2006-08-10 18:22:38 · answer #3 · answered by Indy Finesse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if kobe and wade have chemistry
then i say lakers would be in a much better shape much better than heat
wade as pg kobe as sg
heck add in shaq and its a rollover LOL
2006-08-08 21:14:29 · answer #4 · answered by shong 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both teams would be bad, but the lakers would be slighty better...
kobe and wade wont share the ball, and shaq has know one to run the offence
2006-08-08 16:54:53 · answer #5 · answered by PoppinPilz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
then the Lakers would've let Kobe go
2006-08-08 16:54:46 · answer #6 · answered by Lovely78 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares?
2006-08-08 16:55:03 · answer #7 · answered by K-Deeznuts 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you think about random stuff way to much
2006-08-08 18:08:45 · answer #8 · answered by chris_orsinger 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋