Why do we send bombs and guns to the third World when what they need is Teachers, Medicine, Tractors?

Question

Food, and Farming Techniques and Tourists. Why dont we just pay the third World for their Natural Resources instead of setting them up for War so we rob them - the price is much higher going the War route and its time to stop building weapons and start behaving - treat others as you want to be treated all Western Countries should stop being bastards and be friends with poorer Countries that are poor because we rob them - Stop the War and Stop the Crime - we can start with the USA and the UK Governments do what most of your citizens want and stop bombing people and stirring up trouble - Western Countries are creating Freedom Fighters/Terroists - they are there for a reason. THIRD WORLD WAR really is going to get us all dead!

Answer 1

The American economy is dependent on war. If there would be peace there would be Millions of Americans out of work and the economy would be in serious trouble. There is also the technological advantage that filters to the public sector that again improves the economy and keeps America at the front-line of technology.

Look at the Internet... DARPA that's where it all started...

I'm not saying that most conflicts aren't justified but Trigger happy is an understatement.

Answer 2

First, calm down. It's hard to think things through when you're emotions run unchecked. The fact is we do send teachers, doctors, tractors, medicine, school books, computers, and weapons all over the world. The west is not the reason that there is fighting. Most of those wars have been raging for far longer than the US has even existed. We do not go around bombing places for no reason. Iraq, while the war has been questionably hasty and sloppily done, was given several opportunities to cooperate with the U.N. and refused. Afghanistan was harboring Al Qaida immediately after the 9/11 attacks. The Western countries do create some of their own enemies, and others arise on their own. We do not stir up trouble, there is plenty enough around already. While I think that businesses certainly take advantage of the low wage expectations of third world countries, they do bring in jobs and income that wouldn't otherwise exist- so to say that we are robbing those places isn't accurate or fair, especially in light of all the aid we send them every year. The fact is that many people are angry at their own lives, and need someone to blame- the U.S. is a big target. There's nothing that we can do about that.

Answer 3

Until the countries are stable, medicine will only be given to soldiers, tractors will be used as weapons, and teachers will have no schools in which to teach anyway.

No one is setting them up for war. Western civilization does not create terrorists. They are doing it to themselves. Some people are just greedy. They want power, money, fame, and/or privilege. Those people will start wars with their weaker neighbors to try to take what they have and enslave their people. This has been going on since the beginning of time.

Do you really think that criminals here in America can be stopped with teachers, medicine, and tractors? It's the exact same thing - just on a larger scale. Terrorists don't just want money and power, they also want everyone to switch to their belief system. They believe that anyone who does not live by their religion should be killed. So, should we all convert so as to avoid war?

Sorry, this country was founded on freedoms, and I'm not ready to give them up. You do know that before this started that women were not allowed to go to school or be out in public alone, don't you? They could be killed for such an offense. Do you really believe that is better?

Answer 4

US gives federal funds to a ridiculous amount of the countries in the world, and in ridiculous amounts. The fact that the money never reaches the people, but rather goes into despotic dictators' pockets and arsenals is why we wind up sending the bombs.

It's like when Katrina victims were given $2000 debit cards. For many, that was more money at one time than they had ever gotten, so they didn't save or spend wisely, but wasted it on stuff they didn't need. Giving money to poor people is seldom the answer. Giving poor people the means and incentive to better their own situation works almost every time its tried.

Answer 5

The subjective terms First World, Second World, and Third World, can be used to divide the nations of Earth into three broad categories. Third World is a term first coined in 1952 by French demographer Alfred Sauvy to distinguish nations that aligned themselves with neither the West nor with the Soviet Bloc during the Cold War. Today, however, the term is frequently used to denote nations with a low UN Human Development Index (HDI), independent of their political status (meaning that the PRC, Russia and Brazil, all of which were very strongly aligned during the Cold War, are often termed third world). However, there is no objective definition of Third World or "Third World country" and the use of the term remains common. Some in academia see it as being out of date, colonialist, othering and inaccurate; its use has continued, however [1] In general, Third World countries are not as industrialized or technologically advanced as OECD countries, and therefore in academia, the more politically correct term to use is "developing nation".

Terms such as Global South, less wealthy nations, developing countries, least developed countries and the Majority World have become more popular in circles where the term "third world" is regarded to have derogatory or out-of-date connotations. Development workers also call them the two-thirds world (because two-thirds of the world is underdeveloped) and The South. The term Third World is also disliked as it may imply the false notion that those countries are not a part of the global economic system. Some claim that the underdevelopment of Africa, Asia and Latin America during the Cold War was influenced, or even caused by the Cold War economic, political, and military maneuverings of the most powerful nations of the time. (See Emerging markets)

The term Fourth World (as least developed countries) is used by some writers to describe the poorest Third World countries, those which lack industrial infrastructure and the means to build it. More commonly, however, the term is used to describe indigenous peoples or other oppressed minority groups within First World countries.

Answer 6

You are completely wrong when it comes to the middle east. Humanitarian aid has come from the US (both the US govt and private charities) for years. The corrupt regimes in the middle east divert resources to those in power and allow their people to suffer. For you to claim that the US creates terrorists proves you have no understanding of the dynamic that exists in these countries. The people in power keep hold of their power by keeping their citizens down and afraid. They convince them that what they do is right and the freedom of the Western world is evil. That, and the constant threat of force, is the only way to keep people down and avoid out-and-out revolt.
Now that the Westerners are in their land, those with the power know that the people who are subjected to freedom will never go back to being ruled with an iron fist. The terrorists do not represent the common man in these third world countries. They represent and are supported by the groups which hold the power and do not want to lose it.
You have the misguided ideals of a young pre-teen who has been heavily influenced by our public school system and it's liberal agenda. Your heart is in the right place and your naivete is charming but you obviously are without the facts. Get information from somewhere other than your school and the liberal media. There are plenty of conservative and middle-of-the-road media sources available to balance your intake. Speak to someone in the Military who has been to Iraq. Get the facts and then speak!

Answer 7

Because if you send teachers, medicine and tractors, the dictators, communists, and terrorists will steal it or kill them. You have to send bombs first to get rid of the evil SOBs. Only then can you send in the other things.

Just like any other contstruction site, you have to do a little destruction first (remove trees, flatten ground, etc.) before you can start building.

Answer 8

Yes friend, the fact that you have complained is really increasing in alarming level. Definitely I agree with your point on providing Teachers, Medicines and other infrastructures instead of producing and supplying weapons of mass destruction. But, I can't blame western nations particularly on this behalf. Most of the people whether they are from developed nations, developing nations or from third world has to change their concepts on religion, race and other man-made classifications on human beings. These are the prime suspect in creating conflicts, especially the terrorists. So, to hold these kind activities, people should be aware about the consequences arising from it.

Actually what we need is an organization enjoying self governing organization, through them we can provide public awareness programs for peace. We have UN, but UN has more disadvantages than its advantages. UN is doing great humanitarian efforts, but its poor performances on keeping peace and working mainly on the behalf of 5 security council members makes UN an "Useless Organization".

Answer 9

First off, you're a retard. Sending bombs and guns aren't more expensive...it's actually the other way around. Its much cheaper to bomb them, throw their government into array and indoctrinate them into the society we see fit. Granted it has failed many times, prime example, Iraq. Who do you think put saddam in power? Who do you think allowed that government to become what it was before we bombed them? The United States government. Who do you think created the Al Qaeda, we did. it wasn't supposed to be a terrorist group, it was a group the CIA created to fight off the terrorists and governments without having actualy involvement....and THIS is a LOT cheaper than sending in medical aid and teachers and relief efforts. Instead of changing the way it is, it's cheaper to destory and start from scratch...even though it's never from scratch.

Answer 10

Good question. That WAS the idea behind the Kennedy Administration's Peace Corp which, I'm guessing, has been probably almost entirely defunded or subverted from it's intended mission by the Dumbya Coup. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!

Answer 11

each and every guy or woman who would not comprehend those homes have been delivered down demolition form could be suggestions lifeless. It took NIST 7 years to admit development 7 fell at loose fall velocity yet no one else needs to take that long, in basic terms seem at medical rules. The regulation of Conservation of Momentum which predicts that if the towers had collapsed by using fires or jetliner injury, then that fall might have taken approximately 40 5 seconds because of the measurable medical actuality that the falls might have encountered organic resistance as each and each floor collapsed atop the subsequent. a 10-2nd give way is in finished accord with Galileo‘s regulation of Falling bodies determining the cost of give way of an merchandise for which resistance has been bumped off. prognosis of the collapses by applying structural engineers, physics professors and different scientists conclusively proves that they have been, by applying medical necessity, the outcomes of planned demolition.