English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-08 07:14:25 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Who the hell are Walter Ridgley's diveristy police?

To answer:"Diversity" is a great threat to the spread of right-wing mind control.

2006-08-08 07:27:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In a way of thinking, it is like saying that you shouldn't put all your eggs in one basket. It applies to races...in the US, there is a diversity of races, but it also applies to other things too. Farmers use diversity to safe-guard themselves against a particular crop failure...so they raise corn and pumpkins...if the corn fails, they still have the pumpkins (this is a poor example but it gives you the idea). With people, we use the term to mean someone who can do many different things...that's why at Universities, students have a major and a minor course of study...we do one thing better but we can also do something else. We use the term scientifically in biology to means that plants and animals are of many types (and may inhabit special ecosystems within the same areas).

2006-08-08 14:27:18 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 6 · 0 0

One thing it sure isn't is what the Diversity Police say it is.

Examples: Condie Rice & Alberto Gonzalez.

2006-08-08 14:19:45 · answer #3 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0 0

i may be wrong, but I believe that diversity is an old, old wooden ship from the civil war era.

2006-08-08 14:19:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Agreeing to differ, having tolerance and understanding, appreciating and enjoying the difference.

2006-08-08 14:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by yakkydoc 6 · 0 0

It's what we have in our country versus a country say, like Lebanon.

2006-08-08 14:18:44 · answer #6 · answered by Mike S 7 · 0 0

I forgot because I've been on Y!A too long.

2006-08-08 14:18:20 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0 0

different things

2006-08-08 14:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by beautiful 2 · 0 0

the ability to accept all people!!!!

2006-08-08 14:18:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Diversity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Diversity is the presence of a wide range of variation in the qualities or attributes under discussion.

[edit]
Human context
Amongst humans, particularly in a social context, the term diversity refers to the presence in one population of a (wide) variety of

Cultures,
Ethnic groups
Languages
Physical features, especially if they are recognized by members of that population to constitute characteristics of a race - (see also human variability)
Socio-economic backgrounds
Opinions
Religious beliefs
Sexuality
Gender identity
Neurology
Possible attitudes to this situation are discussed in the Politics section.

At the international level, diversity refers to the existence of many peoples contributing their unique experiences to humanity's culture. The preservation of our planet's formidable linguistic and cultural diversity in the context of world-wide economic integration is the object of great concern to many people at the turn of the 21st century.

Different kinds of diversity exist, e.g. superficial diversity (e.g. differences in gender, ethnicity, nationality) and deep-level diversity (e.g. differences in knowledge and differences in values) (Harrison et al, 2001 or 2002; Jehn et al 1999). Increasing amounts of interaction between individuals reduce the importance of superficial diversity and increase the importance of deep-level diversity. With regard to superficial diversity: its negative effects are stronger to the extent that a faultline develops, separating a group into clear subgroups. This occurs when observable characteristics of individuals in a group correlate, e.g. all the marketeers in a group are young and female, whereas the engineers are old and male (Lau and Murnighan, 1998, 2005). With regard to deep level diversity, informational diversity (differences in knowledge base) has been found to have positive impact on performance, but value diversity (differences in what individuals find important) has been found to have negative impact (Jehn et al 1999).
Politics
The neutrality and factual accuracy of this section are disputed.

Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.

The term "diversity" has no fixed definition upon which sociologists can agree. The term was used by the Supreme Court in the original decision regarding Affirmative Action in the 1970s. Thus, it has been tied to Affirmative Action, and could be considered a legal term, but in recent years has been used more broadly in relation to Globalism. It has also replaced "multiculturalism" on college campuses in the US and assumed much of the same meaning.

Recently diversity has been used to justify recruiting international students or employees. In this context it could be more like eugenics, which is quite different and potentially the opposite of Affirmative Action. In Biology a natural ecosystem needs a diversity of life forms in part to support Evolution and the idea is extended to modern society. (Interestingly, many recent college Biology books use the word Diversity in their title.) This mixing of science and racial issues was common during the era when Eugenics was popular, and it appears to be making a come back. Like Affirmative Action the word Diversity appears to be non-controversial but is highly controversial, particularly if it is made to mean Eugenics. (Eugenics is associated with Nazism.) Of course, diversity has different meanings in other parts of the world where it does not have the same political history.

The term "diversity" is often used in conjunction with the term "tolerance" in liberal political creeds which support the idea that both are valuable and desirable. Many critics of diversity claim that in the political arena, diversity is a code word for forcing people to tolerate or approve people and practices with which they might not otherwise voluntarily associate. Other critics point out that diversity programs in education and business inherently emphasize some minority groups (e.g. blacks, Hispanics, and homosexuals) and do not give equal time to groups (e.g. Jewish immigrants, Filipinos, Asian-Americans, and European immigrants) which lack the "disadvantaged" label. These critics claim that "pluralism" is a more accurate term for the presence of variation, and that, under the banner of "diversity," groups actually forbid criticism of groups that are, in essence, privileged by their minority status. Many politicians, such as Tony Blair, José Luis Zapatero and Gerhard Schröder have praised the ambiguous concept of diversity.

Supporters of the contention that "diversity" is a social goal worth sacrificing for hold that cultural diversity may aid communication between people of different backgrounds and lifestyles, leading to greater knowledge, understanding, and peaceful coexistence. However, modern critics of diversity counter that bringing people together in a forced way often results in some breakdown of social cohesion, especially when the perception exists that diversity goals take precedence over quality in hiring, contracting, and/or academic admissions.

"Diversity" is a confusing term in American politics since no single ethnic group can claim majority status in the United States. When the "Caucasian" label is broken down into its component parts, dramatic differences can be seen between those of Arab (including Egyptian, Lebanese, Syrian, and Palestinian), Celtic, Dutch, Armenian, German, Persian, Hebrew, and Eastern European descent, all of whom share the overly broad label of "Caucasian."

In this political context, the word diversity is often differently understood outside of North America: for example in the UK and most parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa, the US concept of diversity does not wholly exist as there are few US-styled affirmative action programs. This is not to say that others are not supportive of the underlying agenda of US diversity, but it is usually described in different words, such as the terms "respect", "tolerance" and "multi-culturalism." "Respect for Diversity" is one of the six principles of the Global Greens Charter, a manifesto of Green parties from all over the world subscribed to.

In the US, diversity may be a euphemism for the inclusion of individuals or groups thereof who are not of European descent. For example, the National Football League's "Diversity Committee" has imposed a mandate overtly favoring African Americans by fining organizations who do not interview enough African Americans for positions which have been historically dominated by whites. There is no such policy imposed for failure to ethnically diversify positions, such as wide receiver, running back, and defensive back, which are traditionally dominated by blacks. In other words, the "diversity committee" is concerned with coaches and coordinators, but not with positions that are nearly 100% black.

This use of "diversity" as a buzzword also extends to American academia, wherein an attempt to create a "diverse student body" typically supports the recruitment of African-American and Latino students, as well as women in such historically underrepresented fields as the sciences.

Recently the term "diversity" has been used to encompass a much wider range of criteria than merely racial or ethnic classifications. The term is now used to express dimensions of diversity such as age, gender, religion, philosophy, and politics.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity"

2006-08-08 14:17:41 · answer #10 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers