I need help in Algebra can anyone help me?

Question

Points on a line and Quadratic formula

Answer 1

In mathematics, a quadratic equation is a polynomial equation of the second degree. The general form is


where


The letters a, b, and c are called coefficients: the quadratic coefficient a is the coefficient of x2, the linear coefficient b is the coefficient of x, and c is the constant coefficient, also called the free term.

Quadratic equations are called quadratic because quadratus is Latin for "square"; in the leading term the variable gets squared.


The graph of a real valued quadratic function f(x) = ax2 + bx + c, of a real variable x, is a parabola.Contents [hide]
1 Quadratic formula
2 Discriminant
3 Geometry
4 Quadratic factorization
5 Application to higher-degree equations
6 History
7 Derivation
8 Alternative formula
9 Viète's formulas
10 Generalizations
10.1 Characteristic 2
11 See also
12 External links



[edit]
Quadratic formula
A quadratic equation with real (or complex) coefficients has two (not necessarily distinct) solutions, called roots, which may be real or complex, given by the quadratic formula:


where the symbol (see plus-minus sign), indicates that both

and

are solutions.

[edit]
Discriminant
In the above formula, the term underneath the square root sign:


is called the discriminant of the quadratic equation.

A quadratic equation with real coefficients can have either one or two distinct roots, each of which is either real or complex. In this case the discriminant determines the number and nature of the roots. There are three cases:

If the discriminant is positive, there are two distinct roots, both of which are real numbers. For quadratic equations with integer coefficients, if the discriminant is a perfect square, then the roots are rational numbers—in other cases they may be quadratic irrationals.
If the discriminant is zero, there is exactly one root, and that root is a real number. Sometimes called a double root, its value is:

If the discriminant is negative, there are no real roots. Rather, there are two distinct (non-real) complex roots, which are complex conjugates of each other:
and

Thus the roots are distinct, if and only if the discriminant is non-zero, and the roots are real, if and only if the discriminant is non-negative.

[edit]
Geometry

For the quadratic function:
f(x) = x2 − x − 2 = (x + 1)(x − 2), of a real variable x, the x-coordinates of the points where the graph touches the x-axis, x = −1 and x = 2, are the roots of the quadratic equation: x2 − x − 2 = 0.The roots of the quadratic equation


are also the zeros of the quadratic function:


since they are the values of for which


If a, b, and c are real numbers, and the domain of is the set of real numbers, then the zeros of are exactly the x-coordinates of the points where the graph touches the x-axis.

It follows from the above that, If the discriminant is positive, the graph touches the x-axis at two points, if zero, the graph touches at one point, and if negative, the graph does not touch the x-axis.

[edit]
Quadratic factorization
The term


is a factor of the polynomial


if and only if is a root of the quadratic equation:


It follows from the quadratic formula that


Or equivalently that:


If the quadratic has only one distinct root (the discriminant is zero), the quadratic polynomial can be factored as a perfect square as follows:


[edit]
Application to higher-degree equations
Certain higher-degree equations may be quadratic in form, such as:


which can be written


where

.
Note that the highest exponent is twice the value of the exponent of the middle term. This equation may be resolved directly or with a simple substitution, using the methods that are available for the quadratic, such as factoring, the quadratic formula, or completing the square.

[edit]
History
On clay tablets dated between 1800 BC and 1600 BC, the ancient Babylonians first discovered quadratic equations and also gave early methods for solving them. Indian mathematician Baudhayana who wrote a Sulba Sutra in ancient India circa 8th century BC first used quadratic equations of the form ax2 = c and ax2 + bx = c and also gave methods for solving them.

Babylonian mathematicians from circa 400 BC and Chinese mathematicians from circa 200 BC used the method of completing the square to solve quadratic equations with positive roots, but did not have a general formula. Euclid produced a more abstract geometrical method around 300 BC. The Bakshali Manuscript written in India between 200 BC and 400 CE introduced the general algebraic formula for solving quadratic equations, and also introduced quadratic indeterminate equations (origin of type ax/c = y).

The first mathematician to have found negative solutions with the general algebraic formula, was Brahmagupta (India, 7th century). Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Ḵwārizmī (Persia, 9th century) developed a set of formulae that worked for positive solutions. Abraham bar Hiyya Ha-Nasi (also known by the Latin name Savasorda) introduced the complete solution to Europe in his book Liber embadorum in the 12th century. Bhaskara II (India, 12th century) solved quadratic equations with more than one unknown.

Shridhara (India, 9th century) was one of the first mathematicians to give a general rule for solving a quadratic equation. His original work is lost but Bhaskara II later quotes Shridhara's rule:

Multiply both sides of the equation by a known quantity equal to four times the coefficient of the square of the unknown; add to both sides a known quantity equal to the square of the coefficient of the unknown; then take the square root. [1]
[edit]
Derivation
The quadratic formula is derived by the method of completing the square.


Dividing our quadratic equation by (which is allowed because is non-zero), we have


which is equivalent to


The equation is now in a form in which we can conveniently complete the square. To "complete the square" is to add a constant (i.e., in this case, a quantity that does not depend on ) to the expression to the left of "", that will make it a perfect square trinomial of the form . Since in this case is , we must have , so we add the square of to both sides, getting


The left side is now a perfect square; it is the square of . The right side can be written as a single fraction; the common denominator is . We get


Taking square roots of both sides yields


Subtracting from both sides, we get


Comparing the reduced form x2+b⁄ax+c⁄a to the factored form (x−r1)(x−r2) = x2−(r1+r2)x+r1r2, we see that the sum of the two solution values must be −b⁄a, and their product must be c⁄a. As we may confirm, both these equalities are satisfied, validating our solutions.

[edit]
Alternative formula
In some situations it is preferable to express the roots in an alternate form.


However, it imposes the additional requirement that c be nonzero. If c is zero, this formula correctly gives zero as one root, but fails to give any second, non-zero, root. (When c is zero we have division of zero by zero, which is undefined.)

The actual values of the roots must be the same regardless of which expression we use, so the alternate form is merely an algebraic variation of the common form. For example,





A careful floating point computer implementation differs a little from both forms to produce a robust result. Assuming the discriminant, b2−4ac, is positive and b is nonzero, the code will be something like the following.




Here sgn(b) is the sign function, giving +1 if b is positive and −1 if b is negative; its use ensures that we always add two quantities of the same sign, avoiding catastrophic cancellation. The computation of r2 uses the fact that the product of the roots is c/a.

[edit]
Viète's formulas
Viète's formulas give a simple relation between the roots of a polynomial and its coefficients. In the case of the quadratic polynomial, they take the following form:


and


The first formula above yields a convenient expression when graphing a quadratic function. Since the graph is symmetric with respect to a vertical line through the vertex, when there are two real roots the vertex’s x-coordinate is located at the average of the roots (or intercepts). Thus the x-coordinate of the vertex is given by the expression:


The y-coordinate can be obtained by substituting the above result into the given quadratic equation, giving


[edit]
Generalizations
The formula and its derivation remain correct if the coefficients , and are complex numbers, or more generally members of any field whose characteristic is not 2. (In a field of characteristic 2, the element 2a is zero and it is impossible to divide by it.)

The symbol


in the formula should be understood as "either of the two elements whose square is b2 − 4ac, if such elements exist". In some fields, some elements have no square roots and some have two; only zero has just one square root, except in fields of characteristic 2. Note that even if a field does not contain a square root of some number, there is always a quadratic extension field which does, so the quadratic formula will always make sense as a formula in that extension field.

[edit]
Characteristic 2
In a field of characteristic 2, the quadratic formula, which relies on 2 being a unit, does not hold. Consider the monic quadratic polynomial x2 + bx + c over a field of characteristic 2. If b = 0, then the solution reduces to extracting a square root, so the solution is x = √c and note that there is only one root since –√c = –√c + 2√c = √c. In summary, x2 + c = (x + √c)2. Confer quadratic residue for more information about extracting square roots in finite fields.

In the case that b ≠ 0, there are two distinct roots, but if the polynomial is irreducible, they cannot be expressed in terms of square roots of numbers in the coefficient field. Instead, define the 2-root R(c) of c to be a root of the polynomial x2 + x + c, an element of the splitting field of that polynomial. One verifies that R(c) + 1 is also a root. In terms of the 2-root operation, the two roots of the (non-monic) quadratic ax2 + bx + c are


and


For example, let a denote a multiplicative generator of the group of units of F4, the Galois field of order four (thus a and a + 1 are roots of x2 + x + 1 over F4). Because (a + 1)2 = a, a + 1 is the unique solution of the quadratic equation x2 + a = 0. On the other hand, the polynomial x + ax + 1 is irreducible over F4, but splits over F16, where it has the two roots ab and ab + a, where b is a root of x2 + x + a in F16.

[edit]
See also
Linear equation
Cubic equation
Quartic equation
Quintic equation
Fundamental theorem of algebra
Parabola

Answer 2

equation for a straight line...

y = m*x + b (where m is slope, and b is the y-intercept)

quadratic:

roots = -b/(2*a) +/- sqrt(b^2 - 4*a*c)/(2*a)


ok, the kid didnt ask you to copy paste some huge wikipedia, or mathworld article... geez, if you don't have original answers dont post.
where the quadratic is

a*x^2 + b*x + c = 0

Answer 3

one comes after the other when there are points on a line

Answer 4

Jeeeeezzzzz Kdog. Galois Fields, no less. You've impressed me (but I won't say how )

How about proving that the not-squares of any GF[p^n] (where p>2) are not-squares or squares over the
GF[p^(nm)] as m is odd or even?


Doug

Answer 5

www.purplemath.com is an excellent algebraic website. It has step by step explanations and examples. Additionally, there are examples for you to practice.

Answer 6

Definitely i can help...but first define what is your exact problem.

Read it and mail me ur doubts at [e-mail]

Answer 7

x=

Answer 8

i think kdog is right

Answer 9

y = mx + b

y =( -b +/- (b^2-4ac)) / 2a

Answer 10

what about them?