this will probably be removed also but i was messing around and i asked this... '' i am sue, i've lost my shoe, what do i do? '' and it was removed for some reason, does anyone know which rule i 'violated' as i'm sure it wasnt that offensive.
2006-08-08 04:51:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
i dont think me and this answers business get along, apparently i have now violated in an answer
2006-08-08 05:30:43 · update #1
it says that the reason was private correspondance,what does this mean as i havent corresponded with anyone privately
2006-08-08 05:48:28 · update #2
Some people are really sensitive when it comes to shoes. Especially losing shoes. It can be a very traumatic experience for these people. Shoeitis or something!
Really not sure why it was deleted.
2006-08-08 04:59:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because you are pretending to be Shoeless Sue, when you are CLEARLY Plain Jane. You can't pretend to be another person. That is the rule you violated.
(however, I must add that any IDIOT could tell you weren't for real asking about a lost shoe)
2006-08-08 05:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by Sleek 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hahaha. i had a question removed too asking if anyone had ever tried slimming tablets off the internet. dont know if it violated rules though cos iv never bothered my **** to read them!!!! good luck in finding your shoe by the way.xx
2006-08-08 04:57:52 · answer #3 · answered by nicola 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry love, someone probably reproted it as a nonsense question, if you click on "report abuse" you can see there are loads of different types of "abuse" lol and your question probably fits under one of them-- most probably something like "not a question or an answer"...even though it seemed like a valid question to me!! and by the way u can buy a new pair of shoes from the current summer sale @ BHS (75 % off woohooo) :)
2006-08-08 04:59:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read and reread you comments, a statement, a statement and a question. I could see nothing offencive, perhaps you annoyed the correct grammar brigade or maybe your wilful non use of capital letters was the problem. Don't do it again.
2006-08-08 05:03:07 · answer #5 · answered by ♣ My Brainhurts ♣ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bcos Clines found your shoe SUE branded
2006-08-08 05:19:29 · answer #6 · answered by Eco-Savvy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i had a question removed as well the question was "will Det. Don Flack be back on CSI New York" and there was no offensive in it
2006-08-08 05:05:29 · answer #7 · answered by gerryhead 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it was because I am Mark it's in the Park after dark
2006-08-08 04:57:21 · answer #8 · answered by markhatter 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe because I am Chuck, down on my Luck, would you pay me for a.... couple of jobs round the home...
2006-08-08 04:58:50 · answer #9 · answered by trueair01 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am sue
who had a poo
on the loo
at half past two
hope you liked it ,some people have no sense of humour.
2006-08-08 06:06:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋