2006-08-08 04:10:36 · 13 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They're waiting for O'Reilly to come on and tell them what to think.
2006-08-08 04:16:26 · answer #1 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
a speedy little bit of understanding: The Patriot act, that is hailed because the most instrusive bill into the freedoms and privateness of the yank human beings replaced into written a options in the previous 9-11. And G.W. did not write it. The president isn't to blame for each of the guidelines and expenses that get previous. that is what the Senate and the abode are for. He had the flexibility to veto it, yet at the same time as the vast majority of his crew licensed of it, he did the Presidential ingredient and sided inclusive of his human beings. So that's unlike he's to blame for all the civil liberty themes, the privateness themes, etc. there are a large type of persons in this authorities and that all of them play their roles. i'm no longer a Bush supporter, yet in the previous you bypass knocking the guy learn the way your authorities works and how the job receives carried out.
2016-11-23 15:57:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As an American, I'd be ashamed to *refuse* to support any person who had been elected as head of the nation. What would you suggest we do to avoid supporting ANY current administration? Withhold our taxes? Riot in the streets?
2006-08-08 11:16:25 · answer #3 · answered by LazlaHollyfeld 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most Bush supporters have moved to the "cut and run" crowd.
The remainder are either in a psychological state called denial, or they are born and bred authoritarian personalities. The first type has no clue, the second type has no shame.
2006-08-08 04:34:55 · answer #4 · answered by TxSup 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do you say he lied? Did you not see film of the thousands of Kurds lying dead on the hillside, gassed? We know Saddam is responsible for this. He was supposed to destroy his WMDs. Have you seen the proof he was supposed to provide to the UN? He did not allow inspections for 4 years. Just where do you think the WMDs are now? You had better pray we find them before the terrorists.
2006-08-08 04:16:54 · answer #5 · answered by TheHumbleOne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You should really get your news somewhere besides the moonbat website. The WMDs were there. The proof has been found - which is pretty amazing since the UN gave them months and months to get rid of all of the evidence.
How much meth and equipment do you think they'd find in a meth lab if they gave the suspects months and months to clean out their home?
Come on...who's lying now?
2006-08-08 04:15:38 · answer #6 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He didn't lie, and that's what makes the lazy, stupid liberals so mad - because all of their politicians, Hillary, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy - all of them voted to conduct this war on the SAME intelligence that the White House had... it makes them mad - because for once in their pathetic, corrupt, power hungry careers, they actually did the right thing. And now they want to run away from it...
2006-08-08 05:12:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What lie?
WMD's have been found in Iraq. Youmay see them again after all. Most were moved to Syria after all the grandstanding by the UN...
2006-08-08 04:17:01 · answer #8 · answered by smitty031 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What lie? Go hug a tree or something but stop blasting your nonsense here.
2006-08-08 04:15:39 · answer #9 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Deep inside themselves, they are, but they will never admit it.
2006-08-08 04:14:54 · answer #10 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋