Should the UN be moved? If so where to?

Question

It's obvious being in New York City isn't working. There are too many benefits for diplomats and no incentive to get anything accomplished.

Where would you move it to and why?

Answer 1

Mars!
Because if there's nuclear annihilation on Earth at least the UN will survive so that they can finally rule on Earth.
(something they haven't been able to do so far!)

Answer 2

I don't think it should be moved. Instead of that UN should reach to the people who are suffering mainly from war. There should not be classification such as developed nation or developing nation. UN should have more power to take decisions. It should not be a tail hanging around the five Security Council Members. Instead of involving after crisis, it will be better to involve before that, i.e. "prevention is better than cure". I believe UN is doing a great humanitarian efforts, but UN is still a 'baby doll' in the hands of five security council members.

So, my personal opinion is UN don't have to be moved and the success of UN lies upon how it can create a secure world where there is no weapons with mass destruction and a world with peace and harmony. To achieve this, the quota of permanent seats in Security Council has to be increased.

Answer 3

i think it should definitely be moved, but not those bullshit places like Antarctica or mars.
if it should be moved, it should be moved out of the states entirely, because new york is the most international and probably tolerant state in all of America. and it should move because no one in the states appreciates the united nations and what it has been doing for so many years. my friend works in the un, and when ppl from the states ask him where he works and he says the UN, they laugh and give him no respect. that is only because the u.n. were right when they declared that there were no nuclear weapons in Iraq, and the u.s. were wrong. simple as that. if you go anywhere else in the world, pretty much, and tell the ppl you work in the u.n., you are blessed, and cheered and appreciated beyond a doubt. my friend even got his feet kissed once by a Bosnian, because the u.n. helped end the war there

Answer 4

Somewhere like Lajitas, TX. There's nothing there in the desert. It's really damn hot or cold. Maybe then with no distractions they could actually get some serious work done & not be distracted by the New York City lifestyle.

Answer 5

The UN is a joke, nothing gets done and even if a resolution gets passed it has no real teeth. Move it into the East River.

Answer 6

Antarctica would be a good place to put it.

You are very foolish if you think the reason the UN doesn't work is because it is in NYC. It would be a failure no matter where it is.

We don't want nor do we need a one world goverment like the UN elites want.

Answer 7

No need to move it.
Placing the UN in a great American city gives the US a better reputation.

Answer 8

The U.N. should move to the Middle East or Africa with the rest of the corrupt countries.

Answer 9

UN=neeeds to be moved to mars

Answer 10

Chad or Mali, then they could see Global Warming where it affects the common people.