hilary clinton, actually id vote for any one whos name isnt condaleeza rice!!!!!!!
2006-08-08 02:54:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Condoleeza Rice.
2006-08-08 02:53:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pae 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton, she is a strong, intelligent woman that is not afraid to stand up for what is right. She would have an excellent adviser in her husband, the last legally elected president. He also was the best at the business of running the country in over 40 years.
We sure do not need another 4 years of the failed policy's of the Bush administration. Condi Rice would just be a continuation of a bad thing.
2006-08-08 02:56:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
condoleeza rice without hesitation...Hilarious Clinton is waaaay to left wing. If she gets in office she is going to take away MANY of our freedoms and Make the already welfare addicted families even MORE reliant on the government. NOT the direction we need to be going. I also think she will pull the troops back prematurely and this will cause another dictator to overthrow everything we have worked towards and seize control.
2006-08-08 02:56:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by akebhart 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hilary Clinton. How much money did the right wing spend trying to find dirt on the "land deal"? Forty Million Dollars. How many indictments did the Clinton's receive? ZERO!
Common People, Hell! Common Right Wing. Grow Up, Get Over It! MOVE ON!!
2006-08-08 03:08:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by culpstir 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Condoleeza over Hilary anyday.
2006-08-08 03:02:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by chick a dee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rice without a doubt! Anyone that would vote for a woman like Clinton has to be either stupid or crazy... or from NY, lol! How many people did they screw over on that land deal... and then to insult the American public by leaving office while stealing furniture from the White House... come on people!
2006-08-08 02:55:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by MadMaxx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As much as I am opposed to many of Hillary's ideas, there is no way I can, in good conscience, vote for ANY member of this current administration, particularly anyone who said we had no warnings about 9/11 and then during the 9/11 commission hearings reads off the August 6, 2001 PDB entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US."
Some arguments have focused on clear warnings in this letter, specifically that:
* a large attack was planned
* the attack would be on United States soil
* target cities of attacks included New York City and Washington, D.C.
* the World Trade Center was explicitly mentioned
* hijacked plane missions were anticipated
* people living in, or traveling to, the United States were involved
* recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York was witnessed.
----------------------------------
On a side note, it was mentioned in an earlier response that there is fear Hillary would take away our freedom, as she is left wing. You will find that liberals, by definition will live and die in their fight for freedom. Its the right wing administration that's destroying freedom and everything the US stands for.
2006-08-08 03:07:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by jeandupree 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually I wouldn't vote for either one of them. If I were to pick a female candidate that I would actually vote for it would be Madeline (Albright?) Hilary strikes me as a "career politician" and I wouldn't support anyone who would serve with the Bush administration for two terms.
Ron
2006-08-08 03:53:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ron 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. What bothers me more is that Hillary Rotten has so many left wing liberal communists brainwashed that she would have the upper hand if the race with between these two. Thankfully neither will ever get the support needed to be elected.
2006-08-08 02:55:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Mick "7" 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rice.
Hillary is not a good politician and does not know what it's like to be a normal American and has no concern for the good of the country.
2006-08-08 02:53:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Danielle K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋