ITS QUITE NATURAL IN CRICKET.
A MONTH AGO, ENGLAND KNOCKED OUT BY SRI LANKA..
NOW IT KICKING PAK.
TOMORROW OR NEXT MONTH, PAK WILL DOMINATE SOME OTHER COUNTRY.
SO, THERE IS NOTHING TO SAY "POOR".
2006-08-08 04:31:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by A.R.RAJA 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yes Pakistan played poor cricket but any one who has the knowledge of the game knows very well that you can't win a test match with the kind of attack Pakistan played in the recent test matches. I am sure if the likes of Shoiab, Rana, Asif would have been there it would have been a different story all together.
2006-08-09 02:43:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by dua 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We cant say any team poor , if it has lost 2 test matches. Australia lost to Bang, West Indies (the superior team of 1996 than now) lost to Kenya, Australia lost to Zimbabwe in 1983 WC and there are many many other examples. And then u may be aware that Pakistan is such an unpredictable team, they can be defeated by Bang and and they have potential to beat Australia or any of the good teams.
2006-08-08 18:26:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by ckm1975 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. That too in the cricket match against England.
2006-08-08 02:49:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Varun 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I should say England is playing in test matches.
2006-08-08 10:58:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by nuwanusa 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.Pakistan will lose the triangular series also,
commencing on 14 August.
2006-08-08 03:12:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
your right pakistan is poor against South Africa, India and Australia
2006-08-08 06:44:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ultimate Chopin Fan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes they r poorer than india what the pakistan is waste than india they r no buildings that in india it is having.they cannot play a single game.
2006-08-08 02:23:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by LITTLEZIZOU 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
pakistan is still best , their bowlers are not on form and they are in search of good openers
2006-08-08 03:39:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by jamuna160180 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
YOU ARE RIGHT
2006-08-08 05:42:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by neelakh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋