Is it only weeks away or is it more like a couple of years?
2006-08-08 01:55:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes and for him it is an inconvienant truth
2006-08-08 02:00:02 · answer #1 · answered by answering 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? Is he some kind of sex symbol? Last time I saw him on TV he appeared to be a 60 year old white guy with more hair than most, average build. If he was presenting himself as a sex symbol or was an aging movie star who still starred in action movies, this *might* be a topic for discussion. He's a politician, what should matter are his policies, what he says in his speeches, whether he's running for office...
In case anybody's interested here's a link to a recent picture of the Gores -- and Al gained the weight 6 years ago after losing the election, not recently.
2006-08-08 02:12:05 · answer #2 · answered by TxSup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore invented the black hole.
2006-08-08 03:06:58 · answer #3 · answered by The Mick "7" 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok claims they don't collide - curiously she did not examine the articles she presented. unusual. -=- it truly is going to be referred to that merely about all "collisions" between gadgets that are gravitationally certain will be misses, no longer hits. Misses effect in orbits. for sure, both gadgets orbit the barycenter (middle of mass) of the blended device. In different words, except you hit the bull's eye you get a binary device. And on condition that one mass is a lot higher that the different will you get one seeming to orbit around the different, in the different case they both orbit their effortless middle. besides, all orbiting gadgets provide off gravitational waves (so the theory is going, alongside with some info that seems to substantiate it). that signifies that they lose ability and so their orbits will ultimately merge (now to not say it is going to happen anytime quickly, it can take trillions of years). Black holes provide off lots of gravitational ability (back in accordance to theory) so 2 black holes in a binary orbit will merge quicker truly than later. There aren't any sturdy orbits for them (sturdy = on the order of billions of years). So, maximum collisions will be close to misses which except their velocities are fairly intense will effect in a binary device which will ultimately merge. -=- it truly is hypothesized that a large type of the Gold contained in the Universe is from the merger of black holes or neutron stars. (unlike maximum aspects with atomic huge style more effective than iron which come from supernovae.) (see Nucleosynthesis.)
2016-11-23 15:46:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not if Michael Moore collapes into the black hole first!
2006-08-08 02:00:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it would probably contribute to global warming and it would be a major environmental catastrophe. We know how the "most intelligent" man in the world feels about that.
2006-08-08 02:08:56 · answer #6 · answered by dasher 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he's the farthest thing from George Bush's mind.
(I doubt if you got that. Over your head, pun intended.)
When Bush cleans his ears, is there poop on the Q-Tip?
Thanks for the two points and the one on top of your head.
2006-08-08 02:22:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope only weeks away.
2006-08-08 02:01:27 · answer #8 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It can't happen soon enough.
2006-08-08 02:03:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋