English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

the plane! the plane! Gee whats your fantasy? There can be no lasting peace as long as you have factions that insist on the total destruction of Israel. My gosh Israel gave the Palestinians 95% of what they asked for when Arafat was alive, but they were rejected. This has nothing to do with land but with a deep routed hatred that is taught and promoted to each new generation. Strap this bomb on son and go blow up innocent Jews and you will go to paradise. What a perverted fairy tale. How can anyone love their own children that "little".

2006-08-08 01:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by southforty1961 3 · 0 0

Well Hezbollah would have to be disarmed. Isreal and Lebanon would have to respect the borders, although I think Hezbollah is the problem there. Note it ISN'T Lebanon, except in providing a safe haven to Hezbollah. Also to the idea that you have to disarm both, I don't recall Ireland needing to be disarmed to get the IRA to stop.

2006-08-08 01:44:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The most important part of this peace treaty would be to disarm Hezbollah.

2006-08-08 01:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 0

It should be that Hezbollah return the two soldiers that they kidnapped, and that Hezbollah be disarmed. Then there will be peace. As long as Hezbollah isn't a future threat to Israel.

2006-08-08 01:35:01 · answer #4 · answered by peace 2 · 0 0

Everything I know I learned in kindergarten.

Rule number 1. Play nice.

Rule number 2. Share your toys.

Rule number 3. The HezBULLies should be disarmed .... and dis-headed.

2006-08-08 02:24:49 · answer #5 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0 0

Kick both of them out of the country and build the world's biggest Wallmart. Boohoo it offends them to have their sacred land defiled. They should have learned to play togather in preschool like the rest of us. Move them to countries that are more than a rocket launch away preferrably somewhere not as nice as Israel/Palestine. Hezbollah and any group that isn't under the control of a Government needs to have it's rockets and machineguns taken away. Any idiot who claims they need a rocket for home defense NEEDS to have his house blown up immediately.

2006-08-08 01:44:04 · answer #6 · answered by W0LF 5 · 0 0

basically positioned, the Lebanese government ought to be waiting to administration its inhabitants -- no longer something greater, no longer something much less. this would be a scarred united states of america, nonetheless reeling from sectarian violence and the devastating civil conflict. government officers at the instant characterize in hassle-free terms their very own ethnic factions -- or worse nonetheless, Syrian hobbies! on condition that the Lebanese converge on the situation of national id -- and finally, their relatives with Israel -- can this concern ever be resolved. Israel's withdrawal in would 2000 replaced into everyday by utilising the UN as an entire return of Lebanese sovereignty over Lebanon's territory. Hizbullah illegitimately makes use of the situation of the Shab'aa Farms (that's Syrian land, in spite of everything) as a pretext to proceed scuffling with Israel (and up its very own status contained in the eyes of the oftentimes happening public). Israel does no longer seek for to enhance into Lebanon, and has effectively relinquished its carry on all territory belonging to that united states of america. wager whose courtroom the ball is in now...

2016-09-29 01:07:21 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Israel is the real cause of unstability in the Middle East (and even in the western part of the world). Just to protect Israel, the US and its allies have captured Saddam Hussain and destroyed Iraq.

2006-08-08 02:03:43 · answer #8 · answered by pacer_143 2 · 0 0

of course disarm them. without israeli agression there is not need for hezbollah. I think hezbollah fighters should just be "absorbed" into the Lebonese army.

2006-08-08 01:36:54 · answer #9 · answered by redirus92 3 · 0 0

Each would have to respect the border and hezbullah can not remain an armed force .
Hezbullah is a civilian group , not a government , yet they have and use military weapons to accheive political goals .

2006-08-08 01:40:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers