well,in the carpatharan mountains,many evidences and proofs have been found that dragons existed,i saw a whole video on it in the t.v.,they got a well-preserved body of a dragon in those carpatharan mountains.they proofed that it could fly and could breath fire,its DNA was totally new to us.all these factors tell that dragons existed.
it wasn't a dinosaur-so please don't link it with a dino.
whats ur opinion on this?
2006-08-07 22:23:00 · 7 answers · asked by ♀guardian of angels♀ 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
it would take a lot of space to tell u people how they proofed that it could breath fire,thats why i didn't give info. on that
2006-08-07 22:26:52 · update #1
lol,telling u how they proved that such a heavy animal could fly would take a lot of space and time,don't ask me questions on how they proved it,just give me ur opinion
2006-08-07 22:29:41 · update #2
lol the discovery channel dosen't do the work of fooling people around,ok??
2006-08-07 22:30:44 · update #3
Anything is possible. How did they prove that it could breathe fire?
2006-08-07 22:25:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is absolutely no scientific evidence, whatsoever, that dragons existed. The dragon myth belongs in the same category as pixies, fairies, hobgoblins and the Flying Spaghetti Monster... It is pure fantasy a fairy tale.
The arbitrary is that which is neither true nor false... Even the false can be qualified as false, through deliberation and objective identification, such as: 2+2=5. This is exactly what one cannot do with the arbitrary and that is exactly the category that dragons belong to. To disprove something, you have to have evidence that would allow you to falsify it. You cannot falsify the belief in a mind spun concept, that has no connection to reality... Thus, you cannot disprove ghosts either. The fact that they cannot be falsified, is not proof that they are true entities, it is just proof that they are arbitrary concepts and as such are meaningless as having potentiality in reality.
The belief in dragons is often put forward by Creationists, Young Earth Creationists in particular. An example is Kent Hovind, also know as Dr. Dino. He has been preaching the merits of a Young Earth for many years, to a loyal band of Creationist followers.
One of Hovind's arguments, is that dinosaurs are really extinct dragons. This is purely for religious reasons. Because he is a Young Earther, he argues that dinosaurs are dragons and lived alongside mankind. Of course he has no scientific evidence to prove this. He uses the Bible as evidence.
This might be humorous except for the fact, that Hovind is poisoning many young children's minds with this nonsense. It is deflecting them from learning real science.
Even the well know Discovery Institute, an Intelligent Design/Creationism think tank, distances itself from the wacky views espoused by Hovind.
2006-08-07 22:52:31 · answer #2 · answered by atheist_secular_humanist 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dragons are fictional characters. Dragons fly: no animal of that mass can fly. It's unreasonable.
The show you watched was probably on the SciFi channel and was directed by nerdy nerds who create their own fictional reality and then show it on cable television. Case and point: not everything on TV is true.
2006-08-07 22:28:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's a carpatharan mountain? You mean Carpathian. Stop giving names to my mountains, please!
My opinion: yes, they were.
2006-08-07 22:26:23 · answer #4 · answered by Gersin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you mean carpathian mountains? and yes i believe in dragons they are my ancestral gaurdian/ and I have one living in my back yard. his name is darrigan.
2006-08-07 22:26:37 · answer #5 · answered by darkangel1111 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think you have been playing 1 too many rpg games lol grow up
2006-08-07 22:27:14 · answer #6 · answered by princess_cristee 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
history leans toward legend.
2006-08-07 22:25:59 · answer #7 · answered by wally l 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋