read that :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoax_accusations
and try and see for yourself if the conspiracy theories are credible or not. I'm not wasting my time proving it to you if you don't even know the exact accusations and all the facts relating to them.
also, ask yourself why the russians wouldn't have explosed a fraud at that time. (since tey were capable of following the appolo mission spacecrafts using telescopes and radar technology)
or get yourself a VERY good telescope and point it at the moon. You'll see the lunar vehicules are still there.
while you're at it, read this too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato%27s_allegory_of_the_cave
it will probably help you in your conspiratory theories.
2006-08-07 22:25:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The effectiveness of keeping a conspiracy intact is completely dependent on the number of people involved; the more people there are, the less likely the conspiracy will hold over time. There were literally tens of thousands of people involved in the Apollo program, and it has been over thirty years since the last lunar landing; faking the landings and keeping the people silent would have been more difficult than actually performing them.
On three of the Apollo missions, laser reflection dishes were set up which scientists use to this day to accurately calculate the distance between the Earth and the Moon. This equipment could only have been set up manually; no robotic missions could have performed these tasks.
The Clementine lunar satellite was able to take a picture of the Apollo 15 landing site, but the resolution was too low (100 meters) to be considered overwhelming evidence. The Indian space program plans to send a remote sensing spacecraft in 2007, called Chandrayaan I, which has a five meter resolution. Assuming the craft is successful, its images should provide definitive evidence that the moon landings were real.
No matter what evidence one provides, however, someone will always come up with an excuse to negate it. "The scientists are in on the conspiracy with the laser reflector experiment", or "The images from the satellite are fake", or "They set up the Apollo landing sites afterwards using robots". One has to set their own limits on when evidence becomes definitive, and then stand by that limit.
2006-08-08 13:28:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ndcardinal3 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
nobody knows exactly but the people on the mission, i saw on discovery channel when the chinese scientists very impressively proved that all that was a fake and not the real analyses.they showed the photoes and compared them to a place on earth which seemed much alike the moon seemed in the pictures. they even gave the reason y they call all this dumb by saying that NASA told that they interacted on moon while according to science it is not possible at all as there's no air to carry sound waves and they were even walking on the moon freely while the moon 1/6 the gravity on earth. there was something on their shoes also that i dont remember. well i dont wanna make u feel it all wrong theories i just told u what i saw.
2006-08-07 22:53:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by julie 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
-Measurements are taken by lasers of Earth- Moon distant to this day by instruments placed there by astronauts.
- As an amateur astronomer I have seen the Luna modules for myself and I suggest you do the same, even if it means spending thousands of dollars on a telescope. This will save you a lifetime of suspicion, time wasting and save you money on all those conspiracy theory manuals you read.
An education in these things is vital. Stay out of crappy bookshops and go to the library and sit down and read something useful.
If you still have reservations on this issue I suggest you go to some sites of astronauts and NASA, they explain every thing.
Finally seek out the families of the astronauts who died in the capsula fire. Im sure every thing will become crystal clear.
2006-08-07 23:40:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by scoop405106 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
hyperlinks? i'm no longer confident i recognize what you advise. there is comparison outcomes - if the bypass is an similar brightness element, more effective or a lot less, because the historic past, the bypass would look to vanish. As to fakery - this appears like it can be harder to do than merely "faking" the crosses.
2016-11-23 15:33:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by simmers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if you don't accept photos, rocks, or eyewitness accounts from the 12 men who walked on the moon...there's really no way to convince you.
If I paid you $25,000,000 to believe...would you believe?
Besides...prove to me that there's a moon at all to be walked on or that I even exist and am answering your question?
2006-08-07 22:26:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by 4999_Basque 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was a CIA director who said: "Three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead".
Well, there where thousands of NASA people involved in the Moon landing project. If it were fiction, some of them would have sold their story to the press.
2006-08-07 22:32:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by helene_thygesen 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not worth the time or effort trying to prove to an ignorant person like you that humans went.
2006-08-07 22:22:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The moon is in our neighborhood but do you believe that NASA really send there pathfinder (Sojourner ) to Mars.
2006-08-08 04:18:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by latifcom 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
At risk of sounding belligerent...
Where is the proof we never went there?
2006-08-11 04:34:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by sparc77 7
·
0⤊
0⤋