a difficult job consisting of a very complicated laundry list of checpoints and walking 6 miles a shift has up until now been unsupervised and left to the integrety of the front line staff, despite the challanges of the job and low wages they have been doing excellent save for a few problem individuals and unclear standards.
Now management has decided to go from not watching at all to watching every detail, but they have not yet paid the price to bring the systems, rules and policies up to date from the last unsuccessful revision 2 years ago and it will result in a painful transistion and people who have to guess which of two rules is currently being enforced, and new rules are constantly being added.
I am caught between a duty to make the rules fair and consistant, and a duty to hard working honest people to keep them from being punished for our lack of structure in a poorly thought out change.
All this and the change has to happen in buisness time. What is the best soultion?
2006-08-07
21:50:32
·
5 answers
·
asked by
niv-dragon
2
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology
We have a binder that does have the rules in it. They tend to be enforced for about two weeks are no longer availible to be read after a month, and are completely innaccessable after 1 month. All personell are required to read and sign and that amounts to a full three inch binder every month. Although this wont solve the problem it is a critical area to bring up to date, Thanks SS.
2006-08-07
23:50:26 ·
update #1