This is not regarding about experiment, so it is not required. but if you need prove, very simple. Just think of a motionless ball being thrown into a pool of air current, how does the ball react? Does ball rotate 'oppose' to the direction of air current that contact (or exert higher pressure) to that of the ball surface first? No, right?
This concept applies to all physical concepts including magnetic induction too.
And so, actually if you study Fleming's RHR carefully, you'll realise it itself is already proved that 'opposes' in Lenz's Law of Magnetic Induction is wrong. And 'maintain' or 'hold' is more correct.
Above is the 1st step, 2nd step using Fleming's RHR will prove the mistake.
Just simply imagine a coin-shape magnet of 2 poles taking half a circle each, next using a cross-sectional wire going one complete round the magnet, and think how does the induction occur using RHR.
If you can understand fully, then you'll agree that 'opposes' is wrong.
Interesting?
2006-08-07 19:11:28 · 2 answers · asked by Kotami 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Are you sure your implementing the RHR correctly?
2006-08-11 08:06:34 · answer #1 · answered by Grant d 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lenz's regulation is like saying a million+2+3=6 precisely it truly is distinctly uncertain that it truly is a probability to hit upon a flaw in it. If someone can hit upon a flaw, then certain, it can disillusioned a large type of math theories. ;-D do not wager on searching a flaw.
2016-11-23 15:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋